Analyzed statement

What Kim Kataguiri said about approve projects without impact estimates and without a funding source

Kim Kataguiri

Kim Kataguiri

June 16, 2026

View profile →

Against

About: approve projects without impact estimates and without a funding source

Kim Kataguiri: What worries me is the possibility of reducing the autonomy of the autarchies, the autonomy of the regulatory agencies, the autonomy of the Central Bank and, at the same time, granting superpowers so that the Attorney General of the Union can take upon himself cases that should not fall within his competence, that should not be within his remit, because of the political influence to which he is subject. So, we recommend "no."

Kim Kataguiri: Mr. President, the Missão Party opposes it, first, because it is a proposal that lacks an impact estimate, which is a requirement for all proposals that are processed in this House; second, because it has no source of funding, and I think this is the most important point, because we would be benefiting one sector without knowing which sector we would be harming.

Thus, there is noncompliance with the Fiscal Responsibility Law, noncompliance with art. 103 of the ADCT and noncompliance with the Budget Guidelines Law itself.

Kim Kataguiri · 411:20

Kim Kataguiri: I am a little alarmed that the Government's base is in favor, because the Government itself says it is against extending or creating new tax benefits without an impact assessment, without being rigorous about it.

Kim Kataguiri: Yet the base is voting without an impact estimate, without a revenue source, and later appeals to President Hugo Motta to hold bombshell agendas when the Government itself does its work. So, Missão recommends "no."

Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence

alleges the bill violates the LRF, ADCT and LDO.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology