Kim Kataguiri: Mr. President, the Missão Party opposes it, first, because it is a proposal that lacks an impact estimate, which is a requirement for all proposals that are processed in this House; second, because it has no source of funding, and I think this is the most important point, because we would be benefiting one sector without knowing which sector we would be harming.
Kim Kataguiri: Thus, there is noncompliance with the Fiscal Responsibility Law, noncompliance with art. 103 of the ADCT and noncompliance with the Budget Guidelines Law itself.
I am a little alarmed that the Government's base is in favor, because the Government itself says it is against extending or creating new tax benefits without an impact assessment, without being rigorous about it.
Kim Kataguiri: Yet the base is voting without an impact estimate, without a revenue source, and later appeals to President Hugo Motta to hold bombshell agendas when the Government itself does its work. So, Missão recommends "no."
Kim Kataguiri: Mr. President, MISSÃO recommends "no," because, despite the positive aspects of the bill — maybe we can discuss that in the report — I do not find it reasonable to equate it in prioritization.