Analyzed statements
Sessão Deliberativa Extraordinária Semipresencial (AM nº 123/2020)
29 classified statements · 1 politicians · July 1, 2026
Statements by Kim Kataguiri. 29 excerpts classified by topic and stance. Topics: Criminal Procedure, Legislative Process, Human rights, Digital environment regulation.
Speakers
Kim Kataguiri29
Classified statements
Excerpts classified by topic and stance. This is not the full transcript of the video.
Kim Kataguiri
143:08
About: establish life imprisonment for femicide and rape
The Parliamentarians, especially of the Left, who today say they are confronting misogyny, who say they are protecting women, when we voted this year on a bill that hardened penalties in relation to rapists and femicide perpetrators, voted against it.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Criticizes the left for having voted against the toughening of penalties.
Kim Kataguiri
143:23
About: establish life imprisonment for femicide and rape
So, that is the point: the most serious crimes against women are killing a woman and raping a woman.
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence Lists what, according to him, are the most serious crimes against women, without proposing action.
Kim Kataguiri
143:28
About: establish life imprisonment for femicide and rape
And they were against the toughening of penalties in that respect.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence States that 'eles foram contra o endurecimento' — criticizes past action and defends the toughening.
Kim Kataguiri
143:32
About: establish life imprisonment for femicide and rape
Moreover, I recall that they asked here, at the podium beside me, to negotiate in the report to have the toughening apply only in cases of recidivism, that is, only from the moment you raped a second woman, only from the moment you killed a second woman, that you could have the harsher penalty.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Criticizes the proposal to limit the toughening only to recidivism; defends toughening without that limitation.
Kim Kataguiri
143:49
About: establish life imprisonment for femicide and rape
We did not yield, the Rapporteur did not yield. We approved the toughening without the Left's vote.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Calls for approval of the toughening (the group's own action) without support from the left.
Kim Kataguiri
143:55
About: vote on a text only with prior knowledge of its content
The second point I want to make, Mr. President, is that I do not vote for a text that does not exist.
Why it was classified this way · 86% confidence Explicitly declares 'não voto texto que não existe', advocating for a final text before the vote.
Kim Kataguiri
144:00
About: vote on a text only with prior knowledge of its content
So, today we are doing the following: giving a blank check, advancing in the legislative process of a text, which is the PL (Liberal Party) of Misogyny, except there is no final text.
Why it was classified this way · 82% confidence Criticizes advancing the legislative process without the final text of the PL on misogyny.
Kim Kataguiri
144:10
About: vote on a text only with prior knowledge of its content
We do not know exactly what will be voted on, as was already stated here by Deputy Tabata Amaral herself and by the President himself.
Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence Reports that it is not known what will be voted on, describing uncertainty in the process.
Kim Kataguiri
144:18
About: vote on a text only with prior knowledge of its content
So, I do not vote for a text that I do not know, that does not exist.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Repeats 'não voto texto que não conheço' — an explicit position on procedure.
Kim Kataguiri
144:22
About: define act of misogyny in legislation
I cite another point: the last text we have puts absolutely subjective concepts, such as inducing an offense to the dignity of a woman.
Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence Criticizes subjective concepts like 'indução de ofensa' and calls for greater legal objectivity.
Kim Kataguiri
144:34
About: define act of misogyny in legislation
What is inducing an offense? That does not exist today in crimes against honor, for example, which is when one speaks of an offense.
Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence Compares the proposed concept to crimes against honor without proposing an explicit change.
Kim Kataguiri
144:41
About: define discrimination as an act that causes embarrassment or shame
There is another point: in the interpretation of the law, the judge must consider discriminatory — and not only in relation to women, but in relation to all groups — an attitude that causes embarrassment or shame.
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence Describes the interpretive standard proposed in the law without making an explicit value judgment.
Kim Kataguiri
144:58
About: define act of misogyny in legislation
But we are talking, once again, about inserting into the legal order a concept that does not exist, a concept that is subjective and a concept that can be used in the way the judge sees fit, without our having today doctrine, jurisprudence or provision in the legislation.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Opposes inserting a subjective concept without doctrine, jurisprudence, or legal provision.
Kim Kataguiri
145:14
About: authorize suspension of social networks without final judgment and without defense
And a final point is that, in the last text that exists — again, I am speaking about the last text because we do not know if it is the text that we will vote on — there is also a "jabuti" giving extraordinary powers, which once again do not exist today in other legislation, regarding the suspension of a social network.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Denounces a 'jabuti' that gives a judge the power to suspend a social network without a final judgment.
Kim Kataguiri
145:32
About: authorize suspension of social networks without final judgment and without defense
And this is not only for the case of misogyny, but also for other cases in general.
Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence Clarifies that the suspension power would apply beyond the case of misogyny.
Kim Kataguiri
145:37
About: authorize suspension of social networks without final judgment and without defense
We are talking about giving powers to a judge to suspend a social network, without the decision having become final and unappealable, without the exercise of the right of defense, in a bill that supposedly should deal with the protection of women.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence States that the bill allows suspension without the right to defense and without a final judgment.
Kim Kataguiri
145:48
About: vote on a text only with prior knowledge of its content
Therefore, Mr. President, regarding the points of subjectivity, regarding the points of not having a text, regarding the points of creating new criteria and new concepts, that do not exist in any...
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Summarizes problems of advancing without a final text and criticizes the practice.
Kim Kataguiri
145:58
About: define act of misogyny in legislation
And here I am not speaking of misogyny itself, I am speaking of the interpretation and application of a criminal law, of new concepts that are being created, for which I will not allow any leeway.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Declares 'não vou dar margem' to new penal concepts — an explicit position.
Kim Kataguiri
168:08
About: establish life imprisonment for femicide and rape
Mr. President, MISSÃO advises "no". One of the proposals of our party is a new Constitution, on several points, but one of them is the toughening of criminal laws, including life imprisonment for femicide perpetrators and life imprisonment for rapists, agendas that once again unfortunately do not have the support of a large part of this Plenary, including the defenders of this project that we are voting on now.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence States that the party advocates for tougher penalties and life imprisonment for these crimes.
Kim Kataguiri
168:33
About: maintain custodial psychiatric hospitals for dangerous persons
A man was released who killed ten people, the majority of them women; raped three women; killed his own wife, then killed that woman's son, and was released because of the CNJ's decision to end custodial psychiatric hospitals.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Attributes the criminal's release to the CNJ decision and criticizes its effects.
Kim Kataguiri
168:49
About: maintain custodial psychiatric hospitals for dangerous persons
I presented that bill, which was approved in the CCJ.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Claims authorship of a bill approved in the CCJ regarding custody hospitals.
Kim Kataguiri
168:53
About: maintain custodial psychiatric hospitals for dangerous persons
It did not have the vote of the supporters of the misogyny bill.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Criticizes that PL supporters of misogyny did not vote on the custody bill.
Kim Kataguiri
168:57
About: maintain custodial psychiatric hospitals for dangerous persons
So, the man who killed seven women is free, thanks to a measure that met with resistance from the base of the Left Government.
Why it was classified this way · 82% confidence Attributes the release of the perpetrator of serious crimes to the measure and blames resistance from the base.
Kim Kataguiri
169:06
About: approve measures that protect women against violence
So, the discourse of defending women does not hold.
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence Claims that the defense-of-women speech 'não se sustenta', implying a demand for action.
Kim Kataguiri
217:00
About: increase sentence for use of AI in assaults against women
Mr. President, I believe you did not notice, but this text is actually loosening the legislation regarding the use of AI against women.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Says the text loosens punishment for AI use against women, advocating for harsher penalties.
Kim Kataguiri
217:11
About: increase sentence for use of AI in assaults against women
Today, there already exists a law setting the penalty with an increase from 9 to 3 years if you use AI to assault a woman.
Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence Reports the current law that raises the penalty for AI use without proposing an explicit change.
Kim Kataguiri
217:24
About: increase sentence for use of AI in assaults against women
This text restricts it to the scope of domestic violence, that is, it only restricts it to those women with whom the man has a domestic relationship, and it has a lower maximum penalty, of 2 years, whereas the penalty today is 3 years.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence Describes that the text restricts application to domestic violence and reduces the maximum penalty.
Kim Kataguiri
217:39
About: increase sentence for use of AI in assaults against women
So, we are talking about the loosening of a penalty when you use a woman's image and manipulate it with AI.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Affirms explicitly that the bill weakens the penalty for image manipulation with AI.
Kim Kataguiri
217:46
About: defeat the bill that criminalizes misogyny
I honestly think that the majority of the Plenary is not exactly aware of what it is voting on. Missão advises "no".
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence States the party's guidance and that 'Missão orienta "não"' for the vote.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology