Analyzed statement

What Kim Kataguiri said about not appeal to the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) to reverse merely political defeats

Kim Kataguiri

Kim Kataguiri

June 14, 2026

View profile →

For

About: not appeal to the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) to reverse merely political defeats

Kim Kataguiri: And therefore what is provided in the Constitution and in the law, the judiciary must enforce.

Kim Kataguiri: What is not provided, the judiciary should not get involved in.

I have never activated and never will activate the judiciary to... try to do something that is not provided for in legislation.

Kim Kataguiri · 14:32

Desconhecido: Okay, to finish, we would have many more questions, but what is your assessment of the constitutional amendment proposal to end the 6x1 shift pattern, both regarding its chances of approval and regarding the representation filed with the TCU against the federal government's campaign on the matter?

Kim Kataguiri: Well, I have already made my position regarding the PEC itself very clear: I think it is demagoguery, it is populism, it will not make the 6x1 shift end; we are all against the 6x1 shift, but a PEC that will deceive the worker, I voted against it, I was one of the few who had the courage behind the scenes and in the vote publicly to oppose this populist PEC; unfortunately most deputies... All of the government base and some who call themselves right-wing, many of them bolsonarists, ended up voting for the 6x1 PEC out of populism.

Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence

Says they do not turn to the judiciary for matters without legal basis.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology