Analyzed statement

What Kim Kataguiri said about create exceptions to fundamental rights and guarantees in the STJ (Superior Court of Justice) procedural rule

Kim Kataguiri

Kim Kataguiri

July 14, 2026

View profile →

Against

About: create exceptions to fundamental rights and guarantees in the STJ (Superior Court of Justice) procedural rule

Kim Kataguiri: Mr. President, the MISSÃO instructs 'no'. We are creating a rule here to rationalize the proceedings at the STJ (Superior Court of Justice).

Kim Kataguiri: The motion from PT (Workers' Party) states the following: 'If it is a fundamental right or guarantee, we create an exception.'

In Article 5 alone, there are 79 subsections. So a rule that has 79 exceptions is not a rule.

Kim Kataguiri · 167:05

Kim Kataguiri: Another point, which Deputy Pedro Uczai — who is looking at me here — made, which worries me and I think was not what he meant, is: 'How can we allow fundamental rights and guarantees to be adjudicated in the first instance, to be adjudicated in the second instance?' Well, if we consider that the first and second instance courts are not competent enough — judges and appellate judges — to adjudicate fundamental rights and guarantees, we will close down the Judiciary and leave only the higher courts.

Kim Kataguiri: I do not believe that is exactly what the Deputy said he meant.

Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence

Says that 79 exceptions annul the rule, criticizing the creation of too many exceptions.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology