Analyzed statement

What Kim Kataguiri said about require permission for interstate app-based transport

Kim Kataguiri

Kim Kataguiri

May 13, 2026

View profile →

Against

About: require permission for interstate app-based transport

Kim Kataguiri: Moreover, the STF has already ruled in two ADIs and considered the authorization regime constitutional.

Kim Kataguiri: The text ends that regime and requires, at minimum, a permit — something that ANTT does not currently require for this transport, especially for interstate bus apps.

In my assessment, this is a model that contributes to breaking a transport system that today is less predictable, with higher fares and lower-quality buses than those currently provided by apps.

Kim Kataguiri · 230:53

Kim Kataguiri: I say this because I myself am a user, in Brazil, where we used it at several congresses of the Movimento Brasil Livre, not out of loyalty to any app or company, but because of the quality itself — and observing the European market, where these apps are increasingly active, even being the majority in Portugal compared to the traditional transport model.

Kim Kataguiri: Because this model stiffens and hinders this market-liberalizing activity, our position is opposed to the proposal.

Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence

Evaluates the model's effects negatively and criticizes higher fares and worse quality.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology