Kim Kataguiri: Now, when it comes to populism and demagoguery, we'll have 450 votes on the panel.
Kim Kataguiri: Mr. President, Party Mission directs "no", first because this is a very poorly designed public policy to grant a tax privilege that won't have any analysis for national benefit.
Moreover, all the tax privileges that are said to be temporary, in the end become permanent without any review to see if they worked well, if they in fact brought sovereignty, if they in fact brought national fertilizer production to a competitive level.
Kim Kataguiri: Another point is the local content policy aspect that this fertilizer production is bringing in the rapporteur's latest text, which was changed at the last minute, bringing this aspect as well, to which we are absolutely opposed.
Kim Kataguiri: So it seems to me a sectoral benefit without republican concern for the Country; it seems to me a sectoral benefit that will have no analysis regarding its efficiency, its effectiveness or whether its purpose was achieved.