Kim Kataguiri: By imposing payment for unused volume, the model punishes the consumer who uses little water and discourages the rational use of natural resources.
Kim Kataguiri: Under the current model, a large part of the utility's revenue does not vary according to actual water consumption.
This situation may even be advantageous from the point of view of the service provider's financial stability, but it generates significant distortions from a regulatory, environmental and social perspective.
Kim Kataguiri: It is important to recognize, however, that sanitation services have relevant fixed costs, such as the maintenance of networks and treatment plants and the permanent availability of infrastructure, which need to be financed in a stable manner.
Kim Kataguiri: The simple prohibition of charging for minimum consumption, without a tariff restructuring, could create regulatory uncertainty and compromise the economic-financial balance of existing concession contracts, transferring costs in a disorderly manner.