Analyzed statement

What Tabata Amaral said about request urgency and take the bill to the plenary

Tabata Amaral

Tabata Amaral

July 1, 2026

View profile →

For

About: request urgency and take the bill to the plenary

Tabata Amaral: And I repeat: what we are voting on here, because this was agreed, is the urgency, so that I can formally be the Rapporteur of the bill and present the report that was drafted taking into account suggestions from Republicanos, taking into account suggestions from Deputy Adriana Ventura, and taking into account suggestions from various PL parliamentarians.

Tabata Amaral: It seems to me that many people, because they did not have time, because they were focused on other issues, are referencing a text different from the one we are voting on.

It must be clear that voting "no" to this text is not voting no to the fake news that is on the Internet, it is not voting "no" to the Senate text; it is voting "no" to a text that says it is a crime to commit, encourage or induce violence against women.

Tabata Amaral · 177:31

Tabata Amaral: Voting against this text is to say that it is all right for some so-called influencers to record videos and make money teaching how to drug and how to rape a woman.

Tabata Amaral: It is very important to make clear that voting "no" to this urgency today, to a text that has already advanced so much and that was built by so many hands, is not voting "no" to a broad notion of what would be an aversion to women.

Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence

Warns that voting 'não' on the text is to oppose criminalizing the encouragement of violence.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology