Analyzed statements
Sessão Deliberativa Extraordinária Presencial (AM nº 123/2020)
34 classified statements · 1 politicians · May 27, 2026
Statements by Nikolas Ferreira. 34 excerpts classified by topic and stance. Topics: Legislative Process, Combating Impunity, Tariff Policy, Use of Public Funds.
Speakers
Nikolas Ferreira34
Classified statements
Excerpts classified by topic and stance. This is not the full transcript of the video.
Nikolas Ferreira
350:42
About: respect the Internal Rules in the processing of bills
First, the Internal Rules of this House were not respected to place Deputy Marcon's bill as a priority — in fact, tacked on, because it was a related matter, and it simply dealt with hours worked and hours paid.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence criticizes breaches of the Rules of Procedure and demands respect for the legislative process.
Nikolas Ferreira
350:59
About: hold a roll-call vote on this matter
That is the first maneuver. Second maneuver. Who requested the roll-call vote here?
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence asks who requested the nominal vote, describing the procedure.
Nikolas Ferreira
351:05
About: hold a roll-call vote on this matter
It was the PT, wasn't it? I just want to clear up the doubt.
Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence confirmation/report regarding the request for a nominal vote.
Nikolas Ferreira
351:08
About: hold a roll-call vote on this matter
The PT asked for a roll-call vote on this matter for a reason, gentlemen.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence attributes political motives to the request for a nominal vote.
Nikolas Ferreira
351:12
About: hold a roll-call vote in the discussion of the 4x3 schedule
They asked because, when it comes to discussing the 4 by 3 schedule, it will no longer be possible to request a roll-call vote.
Why it was classified this way · 72% confidence says it will not be possible to request a nominal vote in the future discussion.
Nikolas Ferreira
351:20
About: hold a roll-call vote in the discussion of the 4x3 schedule
So it will be symbolic, and it will not be possible to leave their little fingerprint.
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence describes the consequence of the procedure (symbolic vote, without signatures).
Nikolas Ferreira
420:05
About: combat corruption in the state administration
Today is a historic day, the day the Left is allowing me to explain to all of Brazil what they did to the workers, the same ones who, in a little while, will complete 20 years in power, who were responsible for the biggest corruption scandals in this country, who literally left Brazil with the highest tax burden of the last 15 years.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence criticizes past scandals and holds opponents responsible.
Nikolas Ferreira
420:32
About: reduce the tax burden on workers
In this government, 33% of GDP consists solely of taxes.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence reports the statistic (33% of GDP in taxes) without proposing an immediate measure.
Nikolas Ferreira
420:36
About: reduce public spending on international travel
The Lula government set a record in tax collection — only in this year of 2026 it has already collected 1.5 trillion reais in taxes — and it has already spent more than 7 billion reais on international trips.
Why it was classified this way · 82% confidence cites record revenue collection and criticizes spending on travel.
Nikolas Ferreira
420:53
About: reduce deforestation in all biomes
Those who left the country with fires, with 50 million people under organized crime, who left the country without healthcare, without education are the very ones who today claim to be the bastion defending the worker.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence attributes the fires to the past of the opposing government, criticizing its management.
Nikolas Ferreira
421:15
About: promote policies to increase labor productivity
I want to remind you that the defense, or not, of the schedule and the discussion should never have been limited to the schedule itself.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence says the debate should not be only about scale, but about productivity.
Nikolas Ferreira
421:26
About: promote policies to increase labor productivity
As in other countries that are truly examples to the world, we should be discussing productivity.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence advocates discussing productivity as an international benchmark.
Nikolas Ferreira
421:35
About: promote legislative changes through broad debate
It's very easy to come and want to change reality with a stroke of the pen.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence criticizes a solution by 'canetada' and advocates for broader debate.
Nikolas Ferreira
421:38
About: adopt a 4x3 work schedule
Well! This was the proposal we made: "Let's change then, instead of 5 by 2, to 4 by 3." One day more, one day less makes no difference.
Why it was classified this way · 95% confidence makes explicit the proposal to change 5 por 2 to 4 por 3.
Nikolas Ferreira
421:52
About: adopt a 4x3 work schedule
What happened, gentlemen? The Left pulled a maneuver today.
Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence accuses a maneuver that prevented the vote and defends his proposal.
Nikolas Ferreira
421:55
About: adopt a 4x3 work schedule
They buried the possibility of them voting and showing Brazil who would be against the 4 by 3 schedule; they prevented its coming into force tomorrow.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence says they prevented immediate effect of the 4 por 3 and defends implementation.
Nikolas Ferreira
422:42
About: reduce the tax burden on workers
The bigger picture isn't just the schedule — it's your salary, which is being taken from you by the State.
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence asserts that the State 'corta' wages through taxes, a critical claim.
Nikolas Ferreira
422:49
About: reduce the inflation rate
After all, food is getting more and more expensive, gasoline more and more expensive.
Why it was classified this way · 68% confidence reports price increases (food, gasoline) without proposing specific measures.
Nikolas Ferreira
422:56
About: reduce street crime
If you're at a bus stop waiting to go to work and you are robbed, that also affects your salary.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence ties insecurity to its impact on wages, describing a social problem.
Nikolas Ferreira
423:01
About: improve public healthcare services in the State of São Paulo
It's lack of security. The lack of a health system that really provides good care affects your salary.
Why it was classified this way · 72% confidence states that lack of public care forces people to use private services.
Nikolas Ferreira
423:10
About: reduce personal healthcare expenses by strengthening the SUS
People have to turn to the private sector, and your salary is gone.
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence links private health expenditures to salary loss.
Nikolas Ferreira
423:15
About: expand quality public education
School also has to be paid with your salary money, which disappears, because you have to put your child in private school.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence says families resort to private school due to failures in public education.
Nikolas Ferreira
423:48
About: denounce maneuvers to avoid recording votes and defend transparency in parliamentary voting
So, what was the play? "I know! Let's do the following: we'll set 5 by 2, we'll make them vote against it, and we'll put them forward as enemies of the people."
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence attributes the strategy of arranging 5 por 2 to force a political vote.
Nikolas Ferreira
424:57
About: vote in favor of the 4x3 schedule proposal
Because we voted there, it's been voted 'yes'. Want to play the game?
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence says they already voted 'sim' and supports playing the political game.
Nikolas Ferreira
425:47
About: adopt a 4x3 work schedule
And look what's interesting: they wanted to set the coming into force of this bill when, gentlemen?
Why it was classified this way · 86% confidence says he wanted immediate effect (for tomorrow) and criticizes the postponement.
Nikolas Ferreira
426:01
About: adopt a 4x3 work schedule
Do you know what they did? They set a 60-day entry into force, reducing 2 hours and then one year to allow the end of the 6 by 1 schedule.
Why it was classified this way · 84% confidence criticizes the diluted effective period and advocates immediate implementation.
Nikolas Ferreira
426:17
About: assess macroeconomic impacts before implementing labor changes
Do you know why? Because they know there would be the economic effect.
Why it was classified this way · 72% confidence says the postponement occurred due to recognizing economic effects.
Nikolas Ferreira
426:52
About: adopt a 4x3 work schedule
They wanted to present it as if I had proposed that workers work 52 hours, with a transition of 10 years, whereas the 10 years were in the PT report's bill, and the 52 hours were never about total workload — they were about 12 additional hours in the schedule that he may or may not do as overtime.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence defends an interpretation of the proposal and denies having proposed 52 hours.
Nikolas Ferreira
427:51
About: increase consumption taxes
I'm not afraid to say in this chamber that, on my part, I never voted for a tax increase — you, Your Excellencies, did.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence explicitly declares never having voted for tax increases.
Nikolas Ferreira
428:11
About: increase consumption taxes
I never, every 34 days of Government, increased a tax — and created a new tax — like Lula did.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence denies having created new taxes, opposing tax increases.
Nikolas Ferreira
428:18
About: spend public resources on international travel
I never spent 7 billion reais of the Brazilian people.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence denies having spent 7 billion on trips, criticizing that type of expense.
Nikolas Ferreira
428:21
About: use public money for political campaigns
Furthermore, I say this calmly: I never used public money to run a political campaign.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence claims to have never used public money for campaigns.
Nikolas Ferreira
428:47
About: support candidates with moral integrity
I don't want bandits, thieves, corrupt people on my side.
Why it was classified this way · 86% confidence states a preference for honest people and rejection of corrupt ones.
Nikolas Ferreira
428:51
About: support candidates with moral integrity
I want honest people! I want people who do something different for Brazil.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence reiterates the desire for 'gente honesta' who will do things differently for Brazil.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology