Analyzed statements
Kim Kataguiri responde discurso Requião | Por Kim Kataguiri
7 classified statements · 1 politicians · December 12, 2018 · 4 min
Statements by Kim Kataguiri. 7 excerpts classified by topic and stance. Topics: Monetary Policy, Democracy & Electoral Participation.
Speakers
Kim Kataguiri7
Classified statements
Excerpts classified by topic and stance. This is not the full transcript of the video.
Kim Kataguiri
0:25
About: reduce industrial protectionism and open markets
Senator Requião, who was not reelected and, therefore, is now delivering his final speech, a farewell speech in the Senate, gave me, let's say, the honor of mentioning me in his farewell speech, saying a series of absurdities, right? Saying that the new government, for example, is a government of the market and if it is of the market, it is not of the people, it is anti-democratic, right? Senator Requião is that type of communist still trapped in the Cold War and still believes that the market is an evil entity manipulated by big billionaires from the United States and big bankers and half a dozen people who move chess pieces and magically things happen in that ethereal being, that bogeyman called the market.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence rebuts Requião and defends a 'do mercado' government as legitimate and democratic.
Kim Kataguiri
1:09
About: reduce industrial protectionism and open markets
But we are in the 21st century and in the 21st century the market is all of us, including you, Senator Requião. And there is nothing undemocratic about that. On the contrary, in the market people choose the products they want, just as in a democracy they choose the politicians they want. And in this case they did not want to reelect you. And that does not mean that democracy is at risk. It does not mean the new government will govern against the population. It does not mean the new bench in the National Congress is anti-democratic. It only means that the people of Paraná no longer feel represented by you.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence equates the market with individual choice and defends governing with the market in mind.
Kim Kataguiri
1:50
About: respect election results
You lost in the free market of politics, also known as democracy. There is absolutely nothing undemocratic about you not being reelected and right-wing figures like me, like Joyce Hasselman, whom you...
Why it was classified this way · 92% confidence explicitly states that not being re-elected is not undemocratic.
Kim Kataguiri
2:06
About: respect election results
mentioned in your speech, being elected. It only means that you no longer represent, or rather, represent what is worst and most backward in Brazilian politics and precisely for that reason you were rejected so eloquently at the ballot box. There is absolutely nothing...
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence says that rejection at the polls demonstrates a lack of representation, validating the vote.
Kim Kataguiri
2:26
About: reduce industrial protectionism and open markets
wrong with you governing with the market in mind, because governing with the market in mind means governing with people in mind.
Why it was classified this way · 92% confidence argues that governing with the market in mind is governing with people in mind.
Kim Kataguiri
2:32
About: reduce industrial protectionism and open markets
The last governments didn't think about the market, they thought about their own navels. Governments, including ones that you defended very vehemently, right? The so-called innocent president, Dilma, Lula, etc. Those folks — Dilma, very likely, sooner or later should be in jail, and Lula already imprisoned. Those people, yes, only worried about their own navels, only worried about doing the only "reforms." They complain so much: "Ah, new governments want to do tax reform, pension reform, review of the Federative Pact." The only "reforms" the PT governments that you, Senator Requião, managed to defend and implement were the renovations of the Atibaia site and of the Triplex. So it's absurd to say, "oh, poor me, because I lost the election."
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence criticizes past governments for not thinking about the market, listing them negatively.
Kim Kataguiri
3:17
About: respect election results
You mean to say that the new legislature, that the new government will be anti-democratic. There is nothing more democratic than the population, through the ballot box, vehemently rejecting those who have stopped in time, who no longer represent the population and who believe that anything that diverges from their views has no place in democracy. That kind of view, yes, senator, is anti-democratic.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence argues that the people's vote at the ballot box is the most democratic expression.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology