Kim Kataguiri: I call the attention of all parties that claim to defend the worker.
Kim Kataguiri: The bill is saying the following: if a party hires a worker and defaults on labor payments, if it does not pay INSS, if it does not pay FGTS, that party cannot be subject to attachment.
Well, the PT, which voted in favor of urgency, does it not claim to defend the worker so much?
Kim Kataguiri: So, does that mean the PT can stiff the worker?
Kim Kataguiri: Would an employer be allowed to adopt the conduct that is being foreseen in this bill!