Analyzed statements

Sessão Deliberativa Extraordinária Presencial (AM nº 123/2020)

84 classified statements · 1 politicians · May 19, 2026

Statements by Kim Kataguiri. 84 excerpts classified by topic and stance. Topics: Regulatory Policy, Agriculture & Agribusiness, Fiscal Reform, Party Membership.

Speakers

  • Kim KataguiriKim Kataguiri84

Classified statements

Excerpts classified by topic and stance. This is not the full transcript of the video.

  1. Kim Kataguiri

    172:30

    For

    About: transfer authority over cultivation, management and commercialization of species to the Ministry of Agriculture

    Mr. President, this is a project of utmost importance.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence declares explicit support for the project as 'de suma importância'.

  2. Kim Kataguiri

    172:33

    Neutral

    About: use technical opinion to ban productive activity

    Today, unfortunately, in Brazil an agency is being used illegally as a basis for Ibama to prohibit productive activity.

    Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence claims that an agency has been used by Ibama to prohibit productive activity.

  3. Kim Kataguiri

    172:42

    Neutral

    About: prohibit cultivation of species based on classification as invasive

    So, simply for being considered an invasive or exotic species, prohibitions are occurring; indeed, in new studies there are moves to even ban the cultivation of mango and guava in Brazil because of these abuses that have happened, for example in the case of tilapia and tambaqui.

    Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence reports ongoing prohibitions and cites examples without proposing immediate action.

  4. Kim Kataguiri

    173:02

    Neutral

    About: classify species as invasive

    Tambaqui is not an exotic species, but it is considered an invasive species.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence states a fact about the classification of tambaqui without proposing change.

  5. Kim Kataguiri

    173:05

    Neutral

    About: use subordinate regulation to prohibit production of native species

    So, this concerns a Brazilian fish against which there is action under an infra-legal norm, attempting to sabotage production within Brazil, to prohibit production within Brazil.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence states that an infralegal norm tries to prohibit production, describing the practice.

  6. Kim Kataguiri

    173:19

    Neutral

    About: remove restrictions that prevent production and export of native species

    This is already a symbol of backwardness that we are experiencing, because today the world's largest exporter of tambaqui is not Brazil but Asian countries.

    Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence criticizes delay and loss of exports without presenting a direct proposal.

  7. Kim Kataguiri

    173:30

    Neutral

    About: remove restrictions that prevent production and export of native species

    So, we are already so behind and we sabotage ourselves so much, we put so many shackles on our own feet, on our own hands, that we condemn ourselves to underdevelopment.

    Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence denounces the country's self-sabotage without an explicit proposal.

  8. Kim Kataguiri

    173:43

    Neutral

    About: transfer authority over cultivation, management and commercialization of species to the Ministry of Agriculture

    What this bill does is, basically, give the Ministry of Agriculture — as is done in practically most developed countries — the authority regarding the cultivation, breeding, husbandry, transport, processing and commercialization of species used in productive activity, leaving this technical criterion to be evaluated by the Ministry of Agriculture.

    Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence technical description of the project's content, without a direct verb of support.

  9. Kim Kataguiri

    174:10

    For

    About: limit environmental agency's role to preparing lists of exotic and invasive species

    There is nothing in the world parallel to what we have, an agency that should only make a list — as it has always done and should continue doing — about what is an exotic species and what is an invasive species.

    Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence argues that the agency 'só deveria fazer uma lista', proposing a limitation.

  10. Kim Kataguiri

    174:21

    For

    About: maintain issuance of technical opinions on exotic and invasive species

    It is important for us to have that technical opinion.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence explicitly states that 'é importante' to have this technical opinion.

  11. Kim Kataguiri

    174:24

    For

    About: prevent Ibama from using technical opinions to prohibit cultivation, processing and breeding of productive species

    Now, that opinion does not have legal power, it should not and never did — it only started to have it now, with the Lula Government — to be used by Ibama to prohibit cultivation, to prohibit processing, to prohibit the breeding of species that only generate employment and income for our country, including the case I already mentioned of tambaqui, which is Brazilian and for which a restriction is being discussed to breed it in Brazil, and a restriction on tilapia reproduction, which affects mainly small producers.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence says 'esse parecer não deve ter poder legal' and criticizes its use by Ibama.

  12. Kim Kataguiri

    175:00

    For

    About: transfer authority over cultivation, management and commercialization of species to the Ministry of Agriculture

    So, Mr. President, this is an absolutely reasonable bill.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence calls the project 'absolutamente razoável', supporting the measure.

  13. Kim Kataguiri

    175:04

    For

    About: transfer authority over cultivation, management and commercialization of species to the Ministry of Agriculture

    I find it regrettable that the Lula Government is opposed to this matter.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence considers the government's opposition regrettable, indicating support for the bill.

  14. Kim Kataguiri

    175:08

    Neutral

    About: remove regulatory constraints on the agricultural sector

    I think it's a setback for Brazilian producers, a setback for the country's development that, in one of the few areas where we have significant productivity growth in Brazil, of about 2.5% per year on average, which is agribusiness, we put the shackles on ourselves — we sabotage ourselves, we don't even need our external adversaries for that.

    Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence criticizes 'amarras' on agribusiness and the impact on productivity without proposing a measure.

  15. Kim Kataguiri

    175:30

    For

    About: approve the bill that transfers authority over species to the Ministry of Agriculture

    Therefore, my recommendation is in favor, Mr. President.

    Why it was classified this way · 95% confidence explicitly declares a favorable recommendation.

  16. Kim Kataguiri

    196:42

    Against

    About: reduce taxes without cutting public spending or indicating a funding source

    Mr. President, MISSÃO's vote is "no," because there is no tax cut without spending cuts.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence declares a 'não' vote because there's no spending cut tied to the tax cut.

  17. Kim Kataguiri

    196:47

    Against

    About: implement tax reform to rebalance burdens between sectors and reduce taxes on investment and exports

    If we grant tax relief to a productive sector without presenting the estimated impact, the revenue source, in the end either we will increase property taxes on other productive activities — so it will weigh on industry, on commerce, on services — or, ultimately, this will turn into an increase in the CBS rate, the Brazilian VAT, increasing the worst tax of all, which is the tax on consumption.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence lists negative effects of tax relief without an estimate, positioning against it.

  18. Kim Kataguiri

    197:15

    Against

    About: increase consumption taxes without regressive compensation

    This discourages consumption, obviously, because taxes become more expensive, and, at the same time, it mainly penalizes the poorest, who consume the majority of their income, because there is nothing left to invest, nothing left to save.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence says it has regressive effects and penalizes the poorest.

  19. Kim Kataguiri

    197:28

    Against

    About: approve tax cuts without estimate of revenue loss and funding source

    So any tax-cut bill that does not present the estimate of revenue foregone and, at the same time, the source of that spending, is either an increase in debt, or an increase in inflation, or an increase in taxes for other productive sectors.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence demands an estimate and source; without them, opposes the tax cut.

  20. Kim Kataguiri

    225:58

    Against

    About: allow parties to spread party debts over up to 15 years and have protection from seizure and asset freezes

    Mr. President, this bill is a mockery. Look, we are saying that a political party will be able to parcel its debts over 15 years — 15 years of debt installment for a political party — and will only need to start paying one year after the conviction becomes final.

    Why it was classified this way · 92% confidence calls the bill a 'escárnio' for exposing favorable conditions for parties.

  21. Kim Kataguiri

    226:17

    Against

    About: allow parties to spread party debts over up to 15 years and have protection from seizure and asset freezes

    No ordinary citizen, no company has the condition, the right to be able to pay only one year after the conviction and still parcel it over 15 years, with public money, with money from the electoral fund, with money from the party fund.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence compares unequal treatment between citizens/companies and parties, criticizing it.

  22. Kim Kataguiri

    226:32

    Against

    About: prevent parties from being punished with ineligibility for irregularities in accounts

    Furthermore, you cannot punish the political party, prevent it from contesting the elections, in case of irregularities in its accounts.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence states the bill forbids electoral punishment of parties for irregularities.

  23. Kim Kataguiri

    226:39

    Neutral

    About: misuse of party funds to acquire private assets

    There have already been cases of a party that bought a small jet, that bought a helicopter, that bought a meat grinder, that bought a mansion.

    Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence cites historical examples of misuse of party resources.

  24. Kim Kataguiri

    226:45

    Against

    About: allow parties to spread party debts over up to 15 years and have protection from seizure and asset freezes

    That party will not be able to be sanctioned, be prohibited from participating in elections, for using public money that should actually go to health and education, to do a personal business. So, the orientation is "no," Mr. President.

    Why it was classified this way · 95% confidence declares a 'não' recommendation against impunity and favored installment plans.

  25. Kim Kataguiri

    323:15

    For

    About: record the favorable orientation of the Mission Party

    Madam President, I ask that the Missão Party's favorable orientation be recorded.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence asks to explicitly record Partido Missão's favorable stance.

  26. Kim Kataguiri

    323:20

    For

    About: toughen penalties for pedophilia crimes

    I want to congratulate Deputy Minister Osmar Terra for the initiative.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence praises the deputy's initiative and indicates support for the agenda.

  27. Kim Kataguiri

    323:25

    For

    About: toughen penalties for pedophilia crimes

    We will do everything to toughen penalties regarding pedophilia.

    Why it was classified this way · 95% confidence promises 'faremos de tudo' to increase sentences — explicit support.

  28. Kim Kataguiri

    323:30

    For

    About: prohibit and penalize production and consumption of child pornography, including AI-generated

    Even if it is produced with artificial intelligence, we know that the consumption of this type of content leads, later, to the commission of sexual crimes physically and in person, not just to the storage of child pornography.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence supports action against child sexual content even if generated by AI.

  29. Kim Kataguiri

    323:45

    For

    About: increase detention time for minors who commit serious crimes

    Unfortunately, we were not able to vote last week for a longer period of confinement for those minors who commit rapes, like the very sad case we saw of four adolescents who raped two children.

    Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence regrets not having voted for increasing the hospitalization period, expressing support for the measure.

  30. Kim Kataguiri

    324:00

    For

    About: increase detention time for minors who commit serious crimes

    The Lula Government's base, the PT, did not allow us to vote for a harsher punishment for adolescent rapists, in the historical defense they already make of underage criminals.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence attributes obstruction to the government's base and advocates tougher penalties.

  31. Kim Kataguiri

    324:10

    For

    About: approve bill that toughens measures against pedophilia

    But this bill from Deputy Osmar Terra is already a big step forward in combating pedophilia. Thank you.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence calls the bill a 'grande avanço' and supports it.

  32. Kim Kataguiri

    349:04

    Neutral

    About: prevent seizure of party assets for labor debts

    The bill is saying the following: if a party hires a worker and defaults on labor payments, if it does not pay INSS, if it does not pay FGTS, that party cannot be subject to attachment.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence summarizes the bill text that protects parties from seizure for labor debts.

  33. Kim Kataguiri

    349:20

    Against

    About: prevent seizure of party assets for labor debts

    Well, the PT, which voted in favor of urgency, does it not claim to defend the worker so much?

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Accuses PT of hypocrisy for supporting urgency for a bill that protects parties.

  34. Kim Kataguiri

    349:25

    Against

    About: prevent seizure of party assets for labor debts

    So, does that mean the PT can stiff the worker?

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Questions whether the bill allows parties to 'dar calote' on workers.

  35. Kim Kataguiri

    349:30

    Against

    About: prevent seizure of party assets for labor debts

    Would an employer be allowed to adopt the conduct that is being foreseen in this bill!

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Contrasts the treatment of businessmen and parties to criticize the bill.

  36. Kim Kataguiri

    349:34

    Neutral

    About: seize assets of delinquent business owners

    An employer will owe taxes! They will be subject to attachment.

    Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence Explains the usual consequence for indebted businessmen.

  37. Kim Kataguiri

    349:37

    Neutral

    About: seize assets of delinquent business owners

    They take everything, they take the employer's house, they don't take just the company.

    Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence Describes seizure measures that affect the businessman's personal assets.

  38. Kim Kataguiri

    349:41

    Neutral

    About: seize assets of delinquent business owners

    If an employer cheats or delays any labor payment!

    Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence Reiterates the argument about penalties applied to delinquent businessmen.

  39. Kim Kataguiri

    349:46

    Neutral

    About: seize assets of delinquent business owners

    They don't just take the whole company, they take all his personal assets.

    Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence Reaffirms that businessmen lose personal assets in seizures.

  40. Kim Kataguiri

    349:49

    Against

    About: allow parties to spread party debts over up to 15 years and have protection from seizure and asset freezes

    Now, when it comes to a political party? Then, yes, the PT, the Government's base, one of their parties can hire a worker, not pay the FGTS, not pay Social Security, and cannot be attached nor have its assets blocked.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Denounces that a party can contract, not remit funds, and remain protected from seizure.

  41. Kim Kataguiri

    350:09

    Neutral

    About: allow parties to have protection from seizure and asset freezes even after conviction

    This is what article 44-B provides: there cannot be blocking, there cannot be attachment, even if there is a criminal conviction.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Cites the text of art.44-B that prevents seizure and blocking without a new request.

  42. Kim Kataguiri

    350:18

    Neutral

    About: allow parties to have protection from seizure and asset freezes even after conviction

    If they commit crimes, they will not be able to be attached, they will not be able to have assets blocked.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Summarizes the article's effect: seizure would be impossible even for criminal acts.

  43. Kim Kataguiri

    350:22

    Neutral

    About: seize assets for tax debts when debtor is a business owner

    And on the tax front? Let a Brazilian employer not pay tax and see what happens.

    Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence Compares the tax treatment of businessmen with the treatment afforded to parties.

  44. Kim Kataguiri

    350:29

    Against

    About: prevent the Treasury from acting to seize parties' assets for tax debts

    For political parties, it is not like that. If a party defaults, the Treasury cannot act in the same way.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence States the bill prevents the Treasury from acting against parties, criticizing it.

  45. Kim Kataguiri

    350:36

    Against

    About: tax the population widely without exempting political parties

    It's funny: the Ministry of Finance, Haddad wants to tax everyone, except political parties.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Accuses the minister of wanting to tax everyone except parties, criticizing the inconsistency.

  46. Kim Kataguiri

    350:43

    Against

    About: prevent seizure and freezing of parties' assets for tax debts

    They can default on taxes without suffering attachments or asset blocks.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Denounces that parties can 'dar calote' without being subject to asset seizure.

  47. Kim Kataguiri

    350:49

    Neutral

    About: allow parties to create educational institutions with resources from the party fund

    Another permission expressly provided in the text: parties can create colleges, educational institutions with money from the Party Fund.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Explains the text explicitly permits creating colleges with party fund resources.

  48. Kim Kataguiri

    351:00

    For

    About: allow parties to create educational institutions with resources from the party fund

    So far, so good. It is important that a party have an educational institution to help in political training.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Says 'até aí, tudo bem', supporting political training provided by a party.

  49. Kim Kataguiri

    351:09

    Against

    About: allow parties to create educational institutions with party fund resources and charge tuition

    But charging tuition is expressly permitted.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Warns that the text authorizes charging tuition at colleges created by parties.

  50. Kim Kataguiri

    351:32

    Against

    About: allow parties to create educational institutions with party fund resources and charge tuition

    That is, the party sets up a college with public money...

    Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Denounces the use of public money for a private college that would still charge tuition.

  51. Kim Kataguiri

    351:36

    Against

    About: allow parties to create educational institutions with party fund resources and charge tuition

    Doesn't the PT and the Government's base defend public money so much for public institutions?

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Questions PT's consistency in allowing the use of public funds for a private college.

  52. Kim Kataguiri

    351:36

    Against

    About: allow parties to create educational institutions with party fund resources and charge tuition

    Public money would go to a private institution, which is a political party, for the founding of a private college, and that party could still charge tuition.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Reiterates criticism about public financing and charging tuition.

  53. Kim Kataguiri

    351:36

    Against

    About: allow parties to create educational institutions with party fund resources and charge tuition

    In other words, the party creates a college with the people's money, and the people cannot access that college for free — tuition may be charged.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Emphasizes that the public will pay for an institution created with the people's money.

  54. Kim Kataguiri

    351:45

    Against

    About: allow parties to create educational institutions with party fund resources and charge tuition

    This is the aberration that is being voted here today.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Calls the permission to charge tuition at a college created with public funds an 'aberração'.

  55. Kim Kataguiri

    363:50

    Neutral

    About: require registered debaters to defend projects under discussion

    Mr. President, I always distrust bills whose debate has no one registered to speak in favor.

    Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence Says he distrusts bills with no registered speakers in favor, without taking immediate action.

  56. Kim Kataguiri

    364:01

    Against

    About: approve the bill under discussion

    I say this because, when there is no one willing to defend their position firmly and vehemently, it is unlikely to be something good — as is the case with this bill.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Says the lack of supporters indicates the bill is unlikely to be good.

  57. Kim Kataguiri

    364:15

    Neutral

    About: pardon parties' financial irregularities through party mergers

    Another point — and I will raise a hypothesis — is the following: if a party receives stolen money in its coffers, and that irregularity is investigated by the technical body that analyzes the accounts, if that party merges with another, it will be amnestied.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Points to the possibility of automatic amnesty in the event of a merger, describing the flaw.

  58. Kim Kataguiri

    364:30

    Neutral

    About: pardon parties' financial irregularities through party mergers

    That is, automatically, the new leadership of the party will not be held responsible for it.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Summarizes that a merger could grant amnesty to party leaderships.

  59. Kim Kataguiri

    364:36

    For

    About: install a CPMI to investigate Banco Master

    It greatly alarms me to see so many people from the Lula Government's base now saying they are concerned with confronting the Banco Master scandal — and I am too, so much so that I signed the CPMI from the beginning.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Says he signed the CPMI and supports investigation of the scandal.

  60. Kim Kataguiri

    364:48

    For

    About: investigate corruption scandals like petrolão and mensalão

    I have no problem going after the PT of Bahia, Senator Flávio Bolsonaro or even the Supreme Court.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Declares willingness to investigate the PT of Bahia, Flávio Bolsonaro, and the STF.

  61. Kim Kataguiri

    364:54

    Against

    About: pardon parties' financial irregularities through party mergers

    But now I see many people from the Lula Government's base with a moralistic discourse defending permanent amnesty for political parties that promote mergers.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Accuses the government's base of defending permanent amnesty and opposes it.

  62. Kim Kataguiri

    365:05

    Against

    About: include amnesty for mergers in the bill regulating party accounts

    Therefore, this is one of the most serious points contained in the text.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Considers an amnesty by merger one of the most serious points in the text.

  63. Kim Kataguiri

    365:09

    Against

    About: allow parties to split debts and choose the number of installments themselves

    Another point I disagree with is the following: if the party has a debt and needs to return funds or pay a fine, it may parcel the payment over up to 15 years — and who decides the number of installments is the party itself!

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence States disagreement with allowing up to 15-year installment plans decided by the party itself.

  64. Kim Kataguiri

    365:22

    Against

    About: allow parties to split debts and choose the number of installments themselves

    Folks, I have never seen someone be condemned to pay a fine and the debtor himself decide the number of installments...

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Expresses disbelief at allowing the debtor to choose installments, criticizing it.

  65. Kim Kataguiri

    365:29

    Against

    About: allow parties to split debts and choose the number of installments themselves

    If only the Justice had that understanding regarding each taxpayer, each debtor! "Look, you are convicted, but you are the one who chooses the number of installments." Well, now that would be something, huh?

    Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Uses sarcasm to reinforce criticism of parties' privilege.

  66. Kim Kataguiri

    365:40

    Against

    About: allow parties to split debts and choose the number of installments themselves

    But that only applies to political parties. That is, the party that is convicted and has to pay a fine may choose the number of installments — and can pay over up to 15 years.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Reaffirms that the ease of installment payments applies only to parties.

  67. Kim Kataguiri

    365:51

    Against

    About: allow parties to split debts and choose the number of installments themselves

    For example: if the party has to pay a fine of 500 thousand reais, it will pay it in gentle installments of 2,700 reais...

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Uses a numeric example to show how lenient the payment of party fines is.

  68. Kim Kataguiri

    365:58

    Against

    About: allow parties to split debts and choose the number of installments themselves

    Imagine — you who are listening to me — the following: to buy a 500 thousand reais car, could you finance it at the dealership paying gentle installments of 2,700 reais?

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Contrasts personal financing with party installment plans to criticize the privilege.

  69. Kim Kataguiri

    366:10

    Against

    About: allow parties to split debts and choose the number of installments themselves

    See: a political party, when it has to pay a fine, can do that.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Reaffirms parties' privilege to pay fines under eased terms.

  70. Kim Kataguiri

    366:18

    Neutral

    About: misuse of party funds to acquire private assets

    I recall there's a history of a party buying a helicopter, a mansion and tons of meat.

    Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Cites a history of parties buying personal goods with party funds.

  71. Kim Kataguiri

    366:25

    Neutral

    About: clarify suspicious party financial reports

    And I also did not understand, when I read it, what occurred in that financial report.

    Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence Says they don't understand the accounts and requests clarification.

  72. Kim Kataguiri

    366:29

    Against

    About: soften accountability for party irregularities through the bill

    In short, all this type of irregularity is being softened by this bill we are voting on now.

    Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Says the bill is enabling irregularities, criticizing impunity.

  73. Kim Kataguiri

    366:34

    Against

    About: approve the bill that amnesties or relaxes party accountability

    So, just to make it very clear: parties like the PT — which voted the urgency of this bill and will vote the merits — no longer have the moral authority to speak about businessmen, about workers, about corruption; in short, they no longer have moral standing to speak and should stay quiet in the Chamber. Thank you.

    Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Says that parties supporting the urgency lose moral standing to criticize corruption.

  74. Kim Kataguiri

    370:12

    Against

    About: denounce maneuvers to avoid recording votes and defend transparency in parliamentary voting

    We have here a deafening silence, or rather, an eloquent silence, which says a lot about the sleaziness that is being carried out here in this vote.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Interprets silence as indicative of 'safadeza' in the vote.

  75. Kim Kataguiri

    370:22

    Against

    About: defend legitimacy to criticize labor rights only when coherent

    They can no longer say anything. No one from the Lula Government's base can say absolutely anything about labor rights or about defaults on labor obligations.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence States that the government's base lost legitimacy to speak about labor rights.

  76. Kim Kataguiri

    370:34

    Against

    About: allow parties to create educational institutions with party fund resources and charge tuition

    They can no longer speak about tax collection, they can no longer speak about embezzlement of public money, they can no longer speak about privatization, because they want to allow you to create a university with public money and then charge tuition, things you have always attacked.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Lists issues on which the government would lose legitimacy by supporting the measure.

  77. Kim Kataguiri

    370:53

    Against

    About: allow parties to create educational institutions with party fund resources and charge tuition

    You said this was the greatest absurd of all, even when we restricted that charge to the richer students.

    Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Recalls previous criticisms about charging fees to accuse inconsistency.

  78. Kim Kataguiri

    376:24

    For

    About: avoid procedural maneuvers that prevent legitimate voting

    Mr. President, in my assessment, there should not even be a vote on the request for a roll-call vote.

    Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence States there should not even be a vote on the nominal request.

  79. Kim Kataguiri

    376:27

    For

    About: provide in the Rules that a request for a nominal vote forces a nominal vote for all

    In my assessment, the Chamber's Rules should provide the following: if a Deputy wants the vote to be roll-call, everyone has to vote roll-call.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Proposes a rule change: everyone votes nominally if requested.

  80. Kim Kataguiri

    376:35

    For

    About: hold a roll-call vote on this matter

    Politics is not an exercise for cowards. If you do not have the courage to put your fingerprint on the bill you defend, on an idea you defend, do not run for office, politics is not for you.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Argues that politicians should publicly state the positions they defend.

  81. Kim Kataguiri

    377:12

    For

    About: approve the bill under discussion

    They don't want to vote roll-call because they know the bill is terrible for society, that it means shifting a bill onto the worker's back, so they don't want to show their names. The orientation is "yes."

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Declares 'a orientação é "sim"' indicating a favorable vote.

  82. Kim Kataguiri

    387:25

    Against

    About: assume responsibility for submitting and defending government bills in the National Congress

    Yes, Madam. Madam President, how curious: once again I want to highlight the silence of the PT Deputies, who so like to talk, but who, faced with this matter, are absolutely cowardly.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Criticizes PT's silence and labels them 'acovardados' in response to the report.

  83. Kim Kataguiri

    387:41

    For

    About: value parliamentarians who publicly take positions and defend them

    I have fundamental differences of worldview with Deputy Chico Alencar, but I recognize that Deputy Chico Alencar is a courageous Deputy, who, regardless of the agenda, has the courage to show his face and defend his position on the floor.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Praises Chico Alencar for the courage to show his face and defend his position.

  84. Kim Kataguiri

    387:57

    For

    About: value parliamentarians who publicly take positions and defend them

    I have differences of worldview with Deputy Adriana Ventura, but Deputy Adriana Ventura always makes a point of taking a stand and speaking in defense of her position.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Acknowledges Adriana Ventura for always taking a stand and speaking publicly.

AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology