Analyzed statements
Sessão Deliberativa Extraordinária Presencial (AM nº 123/2020)
84 classified statements · 1 politicians · May 19, 2026
Statements by Kim Kataguiri. 84 excerpts classified by topic and stance. Topics: Regulatory Policy, Agriculture & Agribusiness, Fiscal Reform, Party Membership.
Speakers
Kim Kataguiri84
Classified statements
Excerpts classified by topic and stance. This is not the full transcript of the video.
ForKim Kataguiri
172:30
About: transfer authority over cultivation, management and commercialization of species to the Ministry of Agriculture
Mr. President, this is a project of utmost importance.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence declares explicit support for the project as 'de suma importância'.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
172:33
About: use technical opinion to ban productive activity
Today, unfortunately, in Brazil an agency is being used illegally as a basis for Ibama to prohibit productive activity.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence claims that an agency has been used by Ibama to prohibit productive activity.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
172:42
About: prohibit cultivation of species based on classification as invasive
So, simply for being considered an invasive or exotic species, prohibitions are occurring; indeed, in new studies there are moves to even ban the cultivation of mango and guava in Brazil because of these abuses that have happened, for example in the case of tilapia and tambaqui.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence reports ongoing prohibitions and cites examples without proposing immediate action.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
173:02
About: classify species as invasive
Tambaqui is not an exotic species, but it is considered an invasive species.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence states a fact about the classification of tambaqui without proposing change.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
173:05
About: use subordinate regulation to prohibit production of native species
So, this concerns a Brazilian fish against which there is action under an infra-legal norm, attempting to sabotage production within Brazil, to prohibit production within Brazil.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence states that an infralegal norm tries to prohibit production, describing the practice.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
173:19
About: remove restrictions that prevent production and export of native species
This is already a symbol of backwardness that we are experiencing, because today the world's largest exporter of tambaqui is not Brazil but Asian countries.
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence criticizes delay and loss of exports without presenting a direct proposal.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
173:30
About: remove restrictions that prevent production and export of native species
So, we are already so behind and we sabotage ourselves so much, we put so many shackles on our own feet, on our own hands, that we condemn ourselves to underdevelopment.
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence denounces the country's self-sabotage without an explicit proposal.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
173:43
About: transfer authority over cultivation, management and commercialization of species to the Ministry of Agriculture
What this bill does is, basically, give the Ministry of Agriculture — as is done in practically most developed countries — the authority regarding the cultivation, breeding, husbandry, transport, processing and commercialization of species used in productive activity, leaving this technical criterion to be evaluated by the Ministry of Agriculture.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence technical description of the project's content, without a direct verb of support.
ForKim Kataguiri
174:10
About: limit environmental agency's role to preparing lists of exotic and invasive species
There is nothing in the world parallel to what we have, an agency that should only make a list — as it has always done and should continue doing — about what is an exotic species and what is an invasive species.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence argues that the agency 'só deveria fazer uma lista', proposing a limitation.
ForKim Kataguiri
174:21
About: maintain issuance of technical opinions on exotic and invasive species
It is important for us to have that technical opinion.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence explicitly states that 'é importante' to have this technical opinion.
ForKim Kataguiri
174:24
About: prevent Ibama from using technical opinions to prohibit cultivation, processing and breeding of productive species
Now, that opinion does not have legal power, it should not and never did — it only started to have it now, with the Lula Government — to be used by Ibama to prohibit cultivation, to prohibit processing, to prohibit the breeding of species that only generate employment and income for our country, including the case I already mentioned of tambaqui, which is Brazilian and for which a restriction is being discussed to breed it in Brazil, and a restriction on tilapia reproduction, which affects mainly small producers.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence says 'esse parecer não deve ter poder legal' and criticizes its use by Ibama.
ForKim Kataguiri
175:00
About: transfer authority over cultivation, management and commercialization of species to the Ministry of Agriculture
So, Mr. President, this is an absolutely reasonable bill.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence calls the project 'absolutamente razoável', supporting the measure.
ForKim Kataguiri
175:04
About: transfer authority over cultivation, management and commercialization of species to the Ministry of Agriculture
I find it regrettable that the Lula Government is opposed to this matter.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence considers the government's opposition regrettable, indicating support for the bill.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
175:08
About: remove regulatory constraints on the agricultural sector
I think it's a setback for Brazilian producers, a setback for the country's development that, in one of the few areas where we have significant productivity growth in Brazil, of about 2.5% per year on average, which is agribusiness, we put the shackles on ourselves — we sabotage ourselves, we don't even need our external adversaries for that.
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence criticizes 'amarras' on agribusiness and the impact on productivity without proposing a measure.
ForKim Kataguiri
175:30
About: approve the bill that transfers authority over species to the Ministry of Agriculture
Therefore, my recommendation is in favor, Mr. President.
Why it was classified this way · 95% confidence explicitly declares a favorable recommendation.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
196:42
About: reduce taxes without cutting public spending or indicating a funding source
Mr. President, MISSÃO's vote is "no," because there is no tax cut without spending cuts.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence declares a 'não' vote because there's no spending cut tied to the tax cut.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
196:47
About: implement tax reform to rebalance burdens between sectors and reduce taxes on investment and exports
If we grant tax relief to a productive sector without presenting the estimated impact, the revenue source, in the end either we will increase property taxes on other productive activities — so it will weigh on industry, on commerce, on services — or, ultimately, this will turn into an increase in the CBS rate, the Brazilian VAT, increasing the worst tax of all, which is the tax on consumption.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence lists negative effects of tax relief without an estimate, positioning against it.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
197:15
About: increase consumption taxes without regressive compensation
This discourages consumption, obviously, because taxes become more expensive, and, at the same time, it mainly penalizes the poorest, who consume the majority of their income, because there is nothing left to invest, nothing left to save.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence says it has regressive effects and penalizes the poorest.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
197:28
About: approve tax cuts without estimate of revenue loss and funding source
So any tax-cut bill that does not present the estimate of revenue foregone and, at the same time, the source of that spending, is either an increase in debt, or an increase in inflation, or an increase in taxes for other productive sectors.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence demands an estimate and source; without them, opposes the tax cut.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
225:58
About: allow parties to spread party debts over up to 15 years and have protection from seizure and asset freezes
Mr. President, this bill is a mockery. Look, we are saying that a political party will be able to parcel its debts over 15 years — 15 years of debt installment for a political party — and will only need to start paying one year after the conviction becomes final.
Why it was classified this way · 92% confidence calls the bill a 'escárnio' for exposing favorable conditions for parties.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
226:17
About: allow parties to spread party debts over up to 15 years and have protection from seizure and asset freezes
No ordinary citizen, no company has the condition, the right to be able to pay only one year after the conviction and still parcel it over 15 years, with public money, with money from the electoral fund, with money from the party fund.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence compares unequal treatment between citizens/companies and parties, criticizing it.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
226:32
About: prevent parties from being punished with ineligibility for irregularities in accounts
Furthermore, you cannot punish the political party, prevent it from contesting the elections, in case of irregularities in its accounts.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence states the bill forbids electoral punishment of parties for irregularities.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
226:39
About: misuse of party funds to acquire private assets
There have already been cases of a party that bought a small jet, that bought a helicopter, that bought a meat grinder, that bought a mansion.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence cites historical examples of misuse of party resources.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
226:45
About: allow parties to spread party debts over up to 15 years and have protection from seizure and asset freezes
That party will not be able to be sanctioned, be prohibited from participating in elections, for using public money that should actually go to health and education, to do a personal business. So, the orientation is "no," Mr. President.
Why it was classified this way · 95% confidence declares a 'não' recommendation against impunity and favored installment plans.
ForKim Kataguiri
323:15
About: record the favorable orientation of the Mission Party
Madam President, I ask that the Missão Party's favorable orientation be recorded.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence asks to explicitly record Partido Missão's favorable stance.
ForKim Kataguiri
323:20
About: toughen penalties for pedophilia crimes
I want to congratulate Deputy Minister Osmar Terra for the initiative.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence praises the deputy's initiative and indicates support for the agenda.
ForKim Kataguiri
323:25
About: toughen penalties for pedophilia crimes
We will do everything to toughen penalties regarding pedophilia.
Why it was classified this way · 95% confidence promises 'faremos de tudo' to increase sentences — explicit support.
ForKim Kataguiri
323:30
About: prohibit and penalize production and consumption of child pornography, including AI-generated
Even if it is produced with artificial intelligence, we know that the consumption of this type of content leads, later, to the commission of sexual crimes physically and in person, not just to the storage of child pornography.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence supports action against child sexual content even if generated by AI.
ForKim Kataguiri
323:45
About: increase detention time for minors who commit serious crimes
Unfortunately, we were not able to vote last week for a longer period of confinement for those minors who commit rapes, like the very sad case we saw of four adolescents who raped two children.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence regrets not having voted for increasing the hospitalization period, expressing support for the measure.
ForKim Kataguiri
324:00
About: increase detention time for minors who commit serious crimes
The Lula Government's base, the PT, did not allow us to vote for a harsher punishment for adolescent rapists, in the historical defense they already make of underage criminals.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence attributes obstruction to the government's base and advocates tougher penalties.
ForKim Kataguiri
324:10
About: approve bill that toughens measures against pedophilia
But this bill from Deputy Osmar Terra is already a big step forward in combating pedophilia. Thank you.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence calls the bill a 'grande avanço' and supports it.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
349:04
About: prevent seizure of party assets for labor debts
The bill is saying the following: if a party hires a worker and defaults on labor payments, if it does not pay INSS, if it does not pay FGTS, that party cannot be subject to attachment.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence summarizes the bill text that protects parties from seizure for labor debts.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
349:20
About: prevent seizure of party assets for labor debts
Well, the PT, which voted in favor of urgency, does it not claim to defend the worker so much?
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Accuses PT of hypocrisy for supporting urgency for a bill that protects parties.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
349:25
About: prevent seizure of party assets for labor debts
So, does that mean the PT can stiff the worker?
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Questions whether the bill allows parties to 'dar calote' on workers.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
349:30
About: prevent seizure of party assets for labor debts
Would an employer be allowed to adopt the conduct that is being foreseen in this bill!
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Contrasts the treatment of businessmen and parties to criticize the bill.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
349:34
About: seize assets of delinquent business owners
An employer will owe taxes! They will be subject to attachment.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence Explains the usual consequence for indebted businessmen.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
349:37
About: seize assets of delinquent business owners
They take everything, they take the employer's house, they don't take just the company.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence Describes seizure measures that affect the businessman's personal assets.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
349:41
About: seize assets of delinquent business owners
If an employer cheats or delays any labor payment!
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence Reiterates the argument about penalties applied to delinquent businessmen.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
349:46
About: seize assets of delinquent business owners
They don't just take the whole company, they take all his personal assets.
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence Reaffirms that businessmen lose personal assets in seizures.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
349:49
About: allow parties to spread party debts over up to 15 years and have protection from seizure and asset freezes
Now, when it comes to a political party? Then, yes, the PT, the Government's base, one of their parties can hire a worker, not pay the FGTS, not pay Social Security, and cannot be attached nor have its assets blocked.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Denounces that a party can contract, not remit funds, and remain protected from seizure.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
350:09
About: allow parties to have protection from seizure and asset freezes even after conviction
This is what article 44-B provides: there cannot be blocking, there cannot be attachment, even if there is a criminal conviction.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Cites the text of art.44-B that prevents seizure and blocking without a new request.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
350:18
About: allow parties to have protection from seizure and asset freezes even after conviction
If they commit crimes, they will not be able to be attached, they will not be able to have assets blocked.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Summarizes the article's effect: seizure would be impossible even for criminal acts.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
350:22
About: seize assets for tax debts when debtor is a business owner
And on the tax front? Let a Brazilian employer not pay tax and see what happens.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence Compares the tax treatment of businessmen with the treatment afforded to parties.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
350:29
About: prevent the Treasury from acting to seize parties' assets for tax debts
For political parties, it is not like that. If a party defaults, the Treasury cannot act in the same way.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence States the bill prevents the Treasury from acting against parties, criticizing it.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
350:36
About: tax the population widely without exempting political parties
It's funny: the Ministry of Finance, Haddad wants to tax everyone, except political parties.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Accuses the minister of wanting to tax everyone except parties, criticizing the inconsistency.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
350:43
About: prevent seizure and freezing of parties' assets for tax debts
They can default on taxes without suffering attachments or asset blocks.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Denounces that parties can 'dar calote' without being subject to asset seizure.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
350:49
About: allow parties to create educational institutions with resources from the party fund
Another permission expressly provided in the text: parties can create colleges, educational institutions with money from the Party Fund.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Explains the text explicitly permits creating colleges with party fund resources.
ForKim Kataguiri
351:00
About: allow parties to create educational institutions with resources from the party fund
So far, so good. It is important that a party have an educational institution to help in political training.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Says 'até aí, tudo bem', supporting political training provided by a party.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
351:09
About: allow parties to create educational institutions with party fund resources and charge tuition
But charging tuition is expressly permitted.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Warns that the text authorizes charging tuition at colleges created by parties.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
351:32
About: allow parties to create educational institutions with party fund resources and charge tuition
That is, the party sets up a college with public money...
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Denounces the use of public money for a private college that would still charge tuition.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
351:36
About: allow parties to create educational institutions with party fund resources and charge tuition
Doesn't the PT and the Government's base defend public money so much for public institutions?
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Questions PT's consistency in allowing the use of public funds for a private college.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
351:36
About: allow parties to create educational institutions with party fund resources and charge tuition
Public money would go to a private institution, which is a political party, for the founding of a private college, and that party could still charge tuition.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Reiterates criticism about public financing and charging tuition.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
351:36
About: allow parties to create educational institutions with party fund resources and charge tuition
In other words, the party creates a college with the people's money, and the people cannot access that college for free — tuition may be charged.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Emphasizes that the public will pay for an institution created with the people's money.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
351:45
About: allow parties to create educational institutions with party fund resources and charge tuition
This is the aberration that is being voted here today.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Calls the permission to charge tuition at a college created with public funds an 'aberração'.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
363:50
About: require registered debaters to defend projects under discussion
Mr. President, I always distrust bills whose debate has no one registered to speak in favor.
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence Says he distrusts bills with no registered speakers in favor, without taking immediate action.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
364:01
About: approve the bill under discussion
I say this because, when there is no one willing to defend their position firmly and vehemently, it is unlikely to be something good — as is the case with this bill.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Says the lack of supporters indicates the bill is unlikely to be good.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
364:15
About: pardon parties' financial irregularities through party mergers
Another point — and I will raise a hypothesis — is the following: if a party receives stolen money in its coffers, and that irregularity is investigated by the technical body that analyzes the accounts, if that party merges with another, it will be amnestied.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Points to the possibility of automatic amnesty in the event of a merger, describing the flaw.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
364:30
About: pardon parties' financial irregularities through party mergers
That is, automatically, the new leadership of the party will not be held responsible for it.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Summarizes that a merger could grant amnesty to party leaderships.
ForKim Kataguiri
364:36
About: install a CPMI to investigate Banco Master
It greatly alarms me to see so many people from the Lula Government's base now saying they are concerned with confronting the Banco Master scandal — and I am too, so much so that I signed the CPMI from the beginning.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Says he signed the CPMI and supports investigation of the scandal.
ForKim Kataguiri
364:48
About: investigate corruption scandals like petrolão and mensalão
I have no problem going after the PT of Bahia, Senator Flávio Bolsonaro or even the Supreme Court.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Declares willingness to investigate the PT of Bahia, Flávio Bolsonaro, and the STF.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
364:54
About: pardon parties' financial irregularities through party mergers
But now I see many people from the Lula Government's base with a moralistic discourse defending permanent amnesty for political parties that promote mergers.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Accuses the government's base of defending permanent amnesty and opposes it.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
365:05
About: include amnesty for mergers in the bill regulating party accounts
Therefore, this is one of the most serious points contained in the text.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Considers an amnesty by merger one of the most serious points in the text.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
365:09
About: allow parties to split debts and choose the number of installments themselves
Another point I disagree with is the following: if the party has a debt and needs to return funds or pay a fine, it may parcel the payment over up to 15 years — and who decides the number of installments is the party itself!
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence States disagreement with allowing up to 15-year installment plans decided by the party itself.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
365:22
About: allow parties to split debts and choose the number of installments themselves
Folks, I have never seen someone be condemned to pay a fine and the debtor himself decide the number of installments...
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Expresses disbelief at allowing the debtor to choose installments, criticizing it.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
365:29
About: allow parties to split debts and choose the number of installments themselves
If only the Justice had that understanding regarding each taxpayer, each debtor! "Look, you are convicted, but you are the one who chooses the number of installments." Well, now that would be something, huh?
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Uses sarcasm to reinforce criticism of parties' privilege.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
365:40
About: allow parties to split debts and choose the number of installments themselves
But that only applies to political parties. That is, the party that is convicted and has to pay a fine may choose the number of installments — and can pay over up to 15 years.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Reaffirms that the ease of installment payments applies only to parties.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
365:51
About: allow parties to split debts and choose the number of installments themselves
For example: if the party has to pay a fine of 500 thousand reais, it will pay it in gentle installments of 2,700 reais...
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Uses a numeric example to show how lenient the payment of party fines is.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
365:58
About: allow parties to split debts and choose the number of installments themselves
Imagine — you who are listening to me — the following: to buy a 500 thousand reais car, could you finance it at the dealership paying gentle installments of 2,700 reais?
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Contrasts personal financing with party installment plans to criticize the privilege.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
366:10
About: allow parties to split debts and choose the number of installments themselves
See: a political party, when it has to pay a fine, can do that.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Reaffirms parties' privilege to pay fines under eased terms.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
366:18
About: misuse of party funds to acquire private assets
I recall there's a history of a party buying a helicopter, a mansion and tons of meat.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Cites a history of parties buying personal goods with party funds.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
366:25
About: clarify suspicious party financial reports
And I also did not understand, when I read it, what occurred in that financial report.
Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence Says they don't understand the accounts and requests clarification.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
366:29
About: soften accountability for party irregularities through the bill
In short, all this type of irregularity is being softened by this bill we are voting on now.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Says the bill is enabling irregularities, criticizing impunity.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
366:34
About: approve the bill that amnesties or relaxes party accountability
So, just to make it very clear: parties like the PT — which voted the urgency of this bill and will vote the merits — no longer have the moral authority to speak about businessmen, about workers, about corruption; in short, they no longer have moral standing to speak and should stay quiet in the Chamber. Thank you.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Says that parties supporting the urgency lose moral standing to criticize corruption.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
370:12
About: denounce maneuvers to avoid recording votes and defend transparency in parliamentary voting
We have here a deafening silence, or rather, an eloquent silence, which says a lot about the sleaziness that is being carried out here in this vote.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Interprets silence as indicative of 'safadeza' in the vote.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
370:22
About: defend legitimacy to criticize labor rights only when coherent
They can no longer say anything. No one from the Lula Government's base can say absolutely anything about labor rights or about defaults on labor obligations.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence States that the government's base lost legitimacy to speak about labor rights.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
370:34
About: allow parties to create educational institutions with party fund resources and charge tuition
They can no longer speak about tax collection, they can no longer speak about embezzlement of public money, they can no longer speak about privatization, because they want to allow you to create a university with public money and then charge tuition, things you have always attacked.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Lists issues on which the government would lose legitimacy by supporting the measure.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
370:53
About: allow parties to create educational institutions with party fund resources and charge tuition
You said this was the greatest absurd of all, even when we restricted that charge to the richer students.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Recalls previous criticisms about charging fees to accuse inconsistency.
ForKim Kataguiri
376:24
About: avoid procedural maneuvers that prevent legitimate voting
Mr. President, in my assessment, there should not even be a vote on the request for a roll-call vote.
Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence States there should not even be a vote on the nominal request.
ForKim Kataguiri
376:27
About: provide in the Rules that a request for a nominal vote forces a nominal vote for all
In my assessment, the Chamber's Rules should provide the following: if a Deputy wants the vote to be roll-call, everyone has to vote roll-call.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Proposes a rule change: everyone votes nominally if requested.
ForKim Kataguiri
376:35
About: hold a roll-call vote on this matter
Politics is not an exercise for cowards. If you do not have the courage to put your fingerprint on the bill you defend, on an idea you defend, do not run for office, politics is not for you.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Argues that politicians should publicly state the positions they defend.
ForKim Kataguiri
377:12
About: approve the bill under discussion
They don't want to vote roll-call because they know the bill is terrible for society, that it means shifting a bill onto the worker's back, so they don't want to show their names. The orientation is "yes."
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Declares 'a orientação é "sim"' indicating a favorable vote.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
387:25
About: assume responsibility for submitting and defending government bills in the National Congress
Yes, Madam. Madam President, how curious: once again I want to highlight the silence of the PT Deputies, who so like to talk, but who, faced with this matter, are absolutely cowardly.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Criticizes PT's silence and labels them 'acovardados' in response to the report.
ForKim Kataguiri
387:41
About: value parliamentarians who publicly take positions and defend them
I have fundamental differences of worldview with Deputy Chico Alencar, but I recognize that Deputy Chico Alencar is a courageous Deputy, who, regardless of the agenda, has the courage to show his face and defend his position on the floor.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Praises Chico Alencar for the courage to show his face and defend his position.
ForKim Kataguiri
387:57
About: value parliamentarians who publicly take positions and defend them
I have differences of worldview with Deputy Adriana Ventura, but Deputy Adriana Ventura always makes a point of taking a stand and speaking in defense of her position.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Acknowledges Adriana Ventura for always taking a stand and speaking publicly.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology