Kim Kataguiri: The bill is saying the following: if a party hires a worker and defaults on labor payments, if it does not pay INSS, if it does not pay FGTS, that party cannot be subject to attachment.
Kim Kataguiri: Well, the PT, which voted in favor of urgency, does it not claim to defend the worker so much?
So, does that mean the PT can stiff the worker?
Kim Kataguiri: Would an employer be allowed to adopt the conduct that is being foreseen in this bill!
Kim Kataguiri: An employer will owe taxes! They will be subject to attachment.