Analyzed statement

What Kim Kataguiri said about allow parties to split debts and choose the number of installments themselves

Kim Kataguiri

Kim Kataguiri

May 19, 2026

View profile →

Against

About: allow parties to split debts and choose the number of installments themselves

Kim Kataguiri: Therefore, this is one of the most serious points contained in the text.

Kim Kataguiri: Another point I disagree with is the following: if the party has a debt and needs to return funds or pay a fine, it may parcel the payment over up to 15 years — and who decides the number of installments is the party itself!

Folks, I have never seen someone be condemned to pay a fine and the debtor himself decide the number of installments...

Kim Kataguiri · 365:22

Kim Kataguiri: If only the Justice had that understanding regarding each taxpayer, each debtor! "Look, you are convicted, but you are the one who chooses the number of installments." Well, now that would be something, huh?

Kim Kataguiri: But that only applies to political parties. That is, the party that is convicted and has to pay a fine may choose the number of installments — and can pay over up to 15 years.

Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence

Expresses disbelief at allowing the debtor to choose installments, criticizing it.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology