Analyzed statement

What Desconhecido said about answer journalists' questions in the debate

DE

Desconhecido

October 17, 2022

For

About: answer journalists' questions in the debate

Desconhecido: symbolic, which takes the cognitive shortcuts of people and people go, lie, lie. So this ended up being a strategy, even if he didn't do media training, it ended up being a positive strategy, right? And Lula losing his speech, his voice there was complicated for him. The

Desconhecido: journalists' block, in which they ask the questions, there is no reply — your assessment of the impact of that block on the debate: did it manage to set some important themes, like the issue of the Supreme Court, the issue of fake news, but did they answer, in your view?

They didn't answer; if they had answered, maybe it would have been the best part, the most constructive part of the debate, but they didn't answer, they said whatever they wanted.

Desconhecido · 154:10

Desconhecido: Deise, already giving a preview of tomorrow's Análise de Pesquisas program, we know that tomorrow there's the IPEC poll, there's fieldwork that won't capture the effects of the debate, which is ending now, but it might eventually pick up the case of the girls from Venezuela.

Desconhecido: What's your assessment of the impact this debate may have, Datafolha, midweek and in this final stretch of the campaign?

Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence

Says that if they had answered it would have been the most constructive part.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology