Analyzed statement

What Kim Kataguiri said about increase consumption taxes without regressive compensation

Kim Kataguiri

Kim Kataguiri

May 19, 2026

View profile →

Against

About: increase consumption taxes without regressive compensation

Kim Kataguiri: Mr. President, MISSÃO's vote is "no," because there is no tax cut without spending cuts.

Kim Kataguiri: If we grant tax relief to a productive sector without presenting the estimated impact, the revenue source, in the end either we will increase property taxes on other productive activities — so it will weigh on industry, on commerce, on services — or, ultimately, this will turn into an increase in the CBS rate, the Brazilian VAT, increasing the worst tax of all, which is the tax on consumption.

This discourages consumption, obviously, because taxes become more expensive, and, at the same time, it mainly penalizes the poorest, who consume the majority of their income, because there is nothing left to invest, nothing left to save.

Kim Kataguiri · 197:15

Kim Kataguiri: So any tax-cut bill that does not present the estimate of revenue foregone and, at the same time, the source of that spending, is either an increase in debt, or an increase in inflation, or an increase in taxes for other productive sectors.

Kim Kataguiri: Mr. President, this bill is a mockery. Look, we are saying that a political party will be able to parcel its debts over 15 years — 15 years of debt installment for a political party — and will only need to start paying one year after the conviction becomes final.

Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence

says it has regressive effects and penalizes the poorest.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology