Analyzed statements
Sessão Deliberativa Extraordinária Presencial (AM nº 123/2020)
43 classified statements · 1 politicians · June 17, 2026
Statements by Kim Kataguiri. 43 excerpts classified by topic and stance. Topics: Legislative Process, Public Management, Education, Innovation and Research.
Speakers
Kim Kataguiri43
Classified statements
Excerpts classified by topic and stance. This is not the full transcript of the video.
ForKim Kataguiri
148:45
About: grant urgency to the project's processing
Mr. President, we instruct 'yes' and, in the same sense as Deputy Gilson, we also wanted to record the Missão party's vote on both urgency motions that were previously voted. Thank you.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence declares a vote guidance of 'sim' and that the party will maintain its vote on the motions.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
174:01
About: extend bidding exemption for public health institutions
Mr. President, article 74 of the Procurement Law already addresses the case of inexigibility when there is only a single supplier, when there is only a single agent capable of supplying that product, supplying that service, a case which today is already the reality at Hemobrás.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence describes that article 74 already addresses the case of a sole supplier (cites Hemobrás) without requesting action.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
174:17
About: extend bidding exemption for public health institutions
So, in my assessment, extending it — and I believe there is even a problem of legislative technique, there will be disagreement when discussing the jurisprudence of this new wording at the STJ (Superior Court of Justice) — I find it problematic to include a new provision for public institutions exclusively for the health system, exclusively for a new product, when today it is already not required when there is a single company.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence says it is 'problemático' to include the new provision and announces an explicit technical disagreement.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
174:43
About: extend bidding exemption for public health institutions
We may be preventing the contracting, by means of a competitive tender, of a better product, better for the patient, cheaper for the Unified Health System and that gives more quality of life to the end user. So, the guidance is 'no', Mr. President.
Why it was classified this way · 92% confidence states the guidance is 'não' and argues the measure could prevent contracting a better product.
ForKim Kataguiri
212:43
About: include technology and robotics in the National Common Curricular Base
When I was Chair of the Education Committee, I also encouraged this debate.
Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence claims to have promoted the debate when he chaired the Education Commission (first person).
ForKim Kataguiri
212:47
About: include technology and robotics in the National Common Curricular Base
As Deputy Tarcísio Motta said, it was done at the National Education Council in 2022 for the National Common Curricular Base, and we were successful in conducting that debate, in approving this subject and placing it in the BNCC.
Why it was classified this way · 82% confidence states they approved the subject and included it in the BNCC, claiming success.
ForKim Kataguiri
213:04
About: encourage development of the robotics, automation and artificial intelligence industry
I think it is a fundamental industry for Brazil's future: robotics, automation, artificial intelligence.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence asserts that robotics and AI are fundamental and that the more they are encouraged, the better.
ForKim Kataguiri
213:09
About: encourage development of the robotics, automation and artificial intelligence industry
The more we can encourage it, the better. The guidance is 'yes'.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence explicitly says 'Quanto mais nós pudermos incentivar, melhor' and announces the party's guidance 'sim'.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
242:14
About: grant tax benefits and sectoral subsidies to large companies
Mr. President, I would call this bill either 'Delay Grant' or 'Millionaire Grant'.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence calls the project 'Bolsa Milionário', a direct critical expression against the measure.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
242:18
About: grant tax benefits and sectoral subsidies to large companies
First, why 'Millionaire Grant'? We already have 200 billion reais in tax privileges granted to large businessmen who have lobbying power inside this National Congress and at the Planalto (Presidential Palace).
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence reports the existence of R$200 billion in tax privileges (data/assessment).
AgainstKim Kataguiri
242:29
About: grant tax benefits and sectoral subsidies to large companies
Studies by Ipea, by FGV, the country's most respected institutions showed that these sectoral benefits turned into profit in the hands of those large businessmen, did not generate jobs, did not generate income and did not increase productivity.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence states studies show the benefits turned into private profit and did not generate jobs, criticizing the policy.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
242:42
About: grant tax benefits and sectoral subsidies to large companies
And the main policies enacted here are precisely subsidies and tax exemptions, which have failed as public policy in our country.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence says that subsidies and tax exemptions 'fracassaram como política pública'.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
242:53
About: increase taxation on trade
Furthermore, the Government has just boasted about having removed the tax on blouses.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence reports that the government was proud to have 'derrubado a taxa das blusinhas' and cites the instrument (import tax).
NeutralKim Kataguiri
242:58
About: increase taxation on trade
One of the instruments of this policy is the import tax, with higher duties to import, including capital goods.
Why it was classified this way · 72% confidence identifies the import tax as an instrument that even applies to capital goods (descriptive).
NeutralKim Kataguiri
243:05
About: increase taxation on trade
A capital good is machinery to produce more cheaply, to add more value to the national industry.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence explains what a capital good is (a machine to produce) without proposing any action.
ForKim Kataguiri
243:09
About: impose tariffs on Brazilian imports
This is used as an instrument for industrial development. The MISSÃO party's guidance is 'yes'.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence declares 'Utiliza-se isso como um instrumento...' and reports that the party directs 'sim'.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
263:24
About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production
Mr. President, we are here basically rehashing the failure of the Informatics Law.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence says it is a reissue of the failure of the Information Technology Law, criticizing the repetition of the same formula.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
263:31
About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production
I want to ask the parliamentarians here who has a domestically-made cell phone.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence asks rhetorically who owns a national cellphone, questioning the policy's effectiveness.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
263:35
About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production
What was the practical result of this law? Who here is now using a cell phone produced in Brazil, of a Brazilian brand?
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence asks what the practical result of the law was and who uses a cellphone produced in Brazil, criticizing its effectiveness.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
263:47
About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production
I think the only iPhone that existed in Brazil was Gradiente's, which was a great failure.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence uses the Gradiente example and calls the experience a 'grande fracasso'.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
263:52
About: implement local content policy and tax benefits for the IT industry
Here, moreover, earlier, I used in my office the Positivo notebook, which is purchased by the Chamber of Deputies.
Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence criticizes the Positivo notebook bought by the Chamber of Deputies as a 'carroça', highlighting a policy failure.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
263:58
About: implement local content policy and tax benefits for the IT industry
It's a piece of junk. It's horrible to work with. It's terrible.
Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence describes the domestically produced product purchased by the Chamber of Deputies as 'péssimo', criticizing the policy's outcome.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
264:01
About: implement local content policy and tax benefits for the IT industry
The Informatics Law was a failure for developing information technology in our country.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence directly states that the Information Technology Law was 'um fracasso' in developing computing in the country.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
264:05
About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production
And it had the same local content policy, the same policy of tax relief, of subsidies, of tax privileges and it failed resoundingly.
Why it was classified this way · 86% confidence Says that the same local content and tax-relief policy 'fracassou fragorosamente'.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
264:14
About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production
We are repeating the same formula. Studies have shown that the industrial policy during Lula 1, Lula 2, Dilma 1, Dilma 2 and now — studies on the new PAC are about to be released — all these incentives that were given became profit in the pocket of the businessman who received that incentive.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Attributes the failure of industrial policies of recent administrations to the diversion of benefits to businessmen.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
264:34
About: implement fiscal and productive policies that accompany credit stimuli
It did not increase productivity, did not strengthen the national industry, did not create jobs, did not increase GDP.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence States that identical policies did not increase productivity, employment, or GDP (direct criticism).
AgainstKim Kataguiri
264:42
About: grant tax benefits and sectoral subsidies to large companies
Zero, zero. Everything that has been a policy identical to this in the last 20 years in our country turned into profit in the hands of businessmen with influence here in Congress and at the Planalto — corrupt businessmen who form cartels, who form oligopolies; oligopolies and cartels that will become even easier with this law.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Accuses that benefits became profit for corrupt businessmen, forming cartels and oligopolies.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
265:07
About: report and approve bills in plenary
This is one of the worst laws I have ever seen in this Legislature.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Labels the proposal as 'uma das piores leis' of the legislature (explicit opposition to approval).
AgainstKim Kataguiri
265:11
About: report and approve bills in plenary
This is a disaster. It's a bomb. It's truly frightening that the majority of Parliament, in a quiet week, in a week when the voting is virtual, should vote for such an atrocity.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Says the proposal is 'um desastre' and criticizes its approval during a quiet week (clear opposition).
AgainstKim Kataguiri
265:24
About: require national content for capital goods and equipment
We put here local content requirements, even when it comes to machines, equipment, systems...
Why it was classified this way · 87% confidence Warns that local content requirements are being applied even to machinery and equipment.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
265:37
About: increase taxation on trade
One of the dumbest things to do is to tax the import of capital goods.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Calls taxing the import of capital goods 'uma das coisas mais burras' (direct criticism).
AgainstKim Kataguiri
265:53
About: require national content for capital goods and equipment
I am preventing the Brazilian entrepreneur from buying a machine that will produce more cheaply, that will produce with higher quality, in order to buy a more expensive machine that will produce worse.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence States that such a policy prevents entrepreneurs from buying cheaper, better machinery (explicit opposition).
AgainstKim Kataguiri
266:03
About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production
So, Mr. President, this is a policy already proven to be a failure.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Says this is 'uma política já comprovadamente fracassada' (critical opinion).
NeutralKim Kataguiri
266:10
About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production
I'm not the one who says this. IPEA says this.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Attributes the negative assessment to institutions (Ipea), citing who says it (reporting an authority).
NeutralKim Kataguiri
266:12
About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production
FGV says this. The country's leading economists say this.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Cites FGV and economists as sources of the criticism (description of institutional support).
AgainstKim Kataguiri
266:17
About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production
It failed miserably and we now reinforce and endorse it in this session at the Chamber of Deputies.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence States that the proposal 'fracassou miseravelmente' and that it is now being reinforced in the Chamber of Deputies (clear opposition).
AgainstKim Kataguiri
267:55
About: require BNDES criteria for national content in public procurement
Once again I emphasize that we have here national content requirements, including when we talk about capital goods, with criteria established by BNDES and with the experience we have already had.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Alerts that criteria established by BNDES and previous experiences are being reproduced (critique).
AgainstKim Kataguiri
268:09
About: grant tax incentives that benefit large entrepreneurs
In our country, this type of policy only served to take money out of the pockets of the poorest workers and put it into Eike Batista's pocket, to take money out of the poorest worker's pocket and put it into the pockets of the brothers Joesley and Wesley Batista.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Says the policy took money from workers and put it into the pockets of billionaires (explicit distributive criticism).
AgainstKim Kataguiri
269:18
About: favor unproductive markets with federal subsidies
We are taking money from the poorest worker, giving this instrument to the Government to do this and putting it into the pocket of a corrupt businessman who has lobbying power in the National Congress and at the Planalto (Presidential Palace).
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Accuses that they are 'pegando o dinheiro público' to benefit corrupt businessmen (direct criticism).
AgainstKim Kataguiri
269:32
About: grant incentives that protect inefficient industries
We are subsidizing inefficiency, we are protecting an industry that lives off siphoning public resources.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence States that they are 'subsidiando a ineficiência' and protecting an industry that lives off public funds.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
270:06
About: grant tax incentives and local content policies for industry
We are taking public money and saying: 'Take this public money and produce worse and more expensive things.'
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Summarizes that the policy makes the public produce 'coisas piores e mais caras' (strong criticism).
AgainstKim Kataguiri
270:18
About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production
I repeat, there is not a serious economist in this country who defends this institutional design.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence States that there is no serious economist who defends that institutional design (denies technical support).
AgainstKim Kataguiri
270:46
About: schedule and vote on the amnesty proposal
This disaster, apparently, is going to be approved, but not with my vote, never with my vote.
Why it was classified this way · 93% confidence Declares that the disaster 'não será aprovado com o meu voto, jamais' (explicit denial of support).
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology