Analyzed statements

Sessão Deliberativa Extraordinária Presencial (AM nº 123/2020)

43 classified statements · 1 politicians · June 17, 2026

Statements by Kim Kataguiri. 43 excerpts classified by topic and stance. Topics: Legislative Process, Public Management, Education, Innovation and Research.

Speakers

  • Kim KataguiriKim Kataguiri43

Classified statements

Excerpts classified by topic and stance. This is not the full transcript of the video.

  1. Kim Kataguiri

    148:45

    For

    About: grant urgency to the project's processing

    Mr. President, we instruct 'yes' and, in the same sense as Deputy Gilson, we also wanted to record the Missão party's vote on both urgency motions that were previously voted. Thank you.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence declares a vote guidance of 'sim' and that the party will maintain its vote on the motions.

  2. Kim Kataguiri

    174:01

    Neutral

    About: extend bidding exemption for public health institutions

    Mr. President, article 74 of the Procurement Law already addresses the case of inexigibility when there is only a single supplier, when there is only a single agent capable of supplying that product, supplying that service, a case which today is already the reality at Hemobrás.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence describes that article 74 already addresses the case of a sole supplier (cites Hemobrás) without requesting action.

  3. Kim Kataguiri

    174:17

    Against

    About: extend bidding exemption for public health institutions

    So, in my assessment, extending it — and I believe there is even a problem of legislative technique, there will be disagreement when discussing the jurisprudence of this new wording at the STJ (Superior Court of Justice) — I find it problematic to include a new provision for public institutions exclusively for the health system, exclusively for a new product, when today it is already not required when there is a single company.

    Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence says it is 'problemático' to include the new provision and announces an explicit technical disagreement.

  4. Kim Kataguiri

    174:43

    Against

    About: extend bidding exemption for public health institutions

    We may be preventing the contracting, by means of a competitive tender, of a better product, better for the patient, cheaper for the Unified Health System and that gives more quality of life to the end user. So, the guidance is 'no', Mr. President.

    Why it was classified this way · 92% confidence states the guidance is 'não' and argues the measure could prevent contracting a better product.

  5. Kim Kataguiri

    212:43

    For

    About: include technology and robotics in the National Common Curricular Base

    When I was Chair of the Education Committee, I also encouraged this debate.

    Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence claims to have promoted the debate when he chaired the Education Commission (first person).

  6. Kim Kataguiri

    212:47

    For

    About: include technology and robotics in the National Common Curricular Base

    As Deputy Tarcísio Motta said, it was done at the National Education Council in 2022 for the National Common Curricular Base, and we were successful in conducting that debate, in approving this subject and placing it in the BNCC.

    Why it was classified this way · 82% confidence states they approved the subject and included it in the BNCC, claiming success.

  7. Kim Kataguiri

    213:04

    For

    About: encourage development of the robotics, automation and artificial intelligence industry

    I think it is a fundamental industry for Brazil's future: robotics, automation, artificial intelligence.

    Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence asserts that robotics and AI are fundamental and that the more they are encouraged, the better.

  8. Kim Kataguiri

    213:09

    For

    About: encourage development of the robotics, automation and artificial intelligence industry

    The more we can encourage it, the better. The guidance is 'yes'.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence explicitly says 'Quanto mais nós pudermos incentivar, melhor' and announces the party's guidance 'sim'.

  9. Kim Kataguiri

    242:14

    Against

    About: grant tax benefits and sectoral subsidies to large companies

    Mr. President, I would call this bill either 'Delay Grant' or 'Millionaire Grant'.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence calls the project 'Bolsa Milionário', a direct critical expression against the measure.

  10. Kim Kataguiri

    242:18

    Neutral

    About: grant tax benefits and sectoral subsidies to large companies

    First, why 'Millionaire Grant'? We already have 200 billion reais in tax privileges granted to large businessmen who have lobbying power inside this National Congress and at the Planalto (Presidential Palace).

    Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence reports the existence of R$200 billion in tax privileges (data/assessment).

  11. Kim Kataguiri

    242:29

    Against

    About: grant tax benefits and sectoral subsidies to large companies

    Studies by Ipea, by FGV, the country's most respected institutions showed that these sectoral benefits turned into profit in the hands of those large businessmen, did not generate jobs, did not generate income and did not increase productivity.

    Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence states studies show the benefits turned into private profit and did not generate jobs, criticizing the policy.

  12. Kim Kataguiri

    242:42

    Against

    About: grant tax benefits and sectoral subsidies to large companies

    And the main policies enacted here are precisely subsidies and tax exemptions, which have failed as public policy in our country.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence says that subsidies and tax exemptions 'fracassaram como política pública'.

  13. Kim Kataguiri

    242:53

    Neutral

    About: increase taxation on trade

    Furthermore, the Government has just boasted about having removed the tax on blouses.

    Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence reports that the government was proud to have 'derrubado a taxa das blusinhas' and cites the instrument (import tax).

  14. Kim Kataguiri

    242:58

    Neutral

    About: increase taxation on trade

    One of the instruments of this policy is the import tax, with higher duties to import, including capital goods.

    Why it was classified this way · 72% confidence identifies the import tax as an instrument that even applies to capital goods (descriptive).

  15. Kim Kataguiri

    243:05

    Neutral

    About: increase taxation on trade

    A capital good is machinery to produce more cheaply, to add more value to the national industry.

    Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence explains what a capital good is (a machine to produce) without proposing any action.

  16. Kim Kataguiri

    243:09

    For

    About: impose tariffs on Brazilian imports

    This is used as an instrument for industrial development. The MISSÃO party's guidance is 'yes'.

    Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence declares 'Utiliza-se isso como um instrumento...' and reports that the party directs 'sim'.

  17. Kim Kataguiri

    263:24

    Against

    About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production

    Mr. President, we are here basically rehashing the failure of the Informatics Law.

    Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence says it is a reissue of the failure of the Information Technology Law, criticizing the repetition of the same formula.

  18. Kim Kataguiri

    263:31

    Against

    About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production

    I want to ask the parliamentarians here who has a domestically-made cell phone.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence asks rhetorically who owns a national cellphone, questioning the policy's effectiveness.

  19. Kim Kataguiri

    263:35

    Against

    About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production

    What was the practical result of this law? Who here is now using a cell phone produced in Brazil, of a Brazilian brand?

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence asks what the practical result of the law was and who uses a cellphone produced in Brazil, criticizing its effectiveness.

  20. Kim Kataguiri

    263:47

    Against

    About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production

    I think the only iPhone that existed in Brazil was Gradiente's, which was a great failure.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence uses the Gradiente example and calls the experience a 'grande fracasso'.

  21. Kim Kataguiri

    263:52

    Against

    About: implement local content policy and tax benefits for the IT industry

    Here, moreover, earlier, I used in my office the Positivo notebook, which is purchased by the Chamber of Deputies.

    Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence criticizes the Positivo notebook bought by the Chamber of Deputies as a 'carroça', highlighting a policy failure.

  22. Kim Kataguiri

    263:58

    Against

    About: implement local content policy and tax benefits for the IT industry

    It's a piece of junk. It's horrible to work with. It's terrible.

    Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence describes the domestically produced product purchased by the Chamber of Deputies as 'péssimo', criticizing the policy's outcome.

  23. Kim Kataguiri

    264:01

    Against

    About: implement local content policy and tax benefits for the IT industry

    The Informatics Law was a failure for developing information technology in our country.

    Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence directly states that the Information Technology Law was 'um fracasso' in developing computing in the country.

  24. Kim Kataguiri

    264:05

    Against

    About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production

    And it had the same local content policy, the same policy of tax relief, of subsidies, of tax privileges and it failed resoundingly.

    Why it was classified this way · 86% confidence Says that the same local content and tax-relief policy 'fracassou fragorosamente'.

  25. Kim Kataguiri

    264:14

    Against

    About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production

    We are repeating the same formula. Studies have shown that the industrial policy during Lula 1, Lula 2, Dilma 1, Dilma 2 and now — studies on the new PAC are about to be released — all these incentives that were given became profit in the pocket of the businessman who received that incentive.

    Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Attributes the failure of industrial policies of recent administrations to the diversion of benefits to businessmen.

  26. Kim Kataguiri

    264:34

    Against

    About: implement fiscal and productive policies that accompany credit stimuli

    It did not increase productivity, did not strengthen the national industry, did not create jobs, did not increase GDP.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence States that identical policies did not increase productivity, employment, or GDP (direct criticism).

  27. Kim Kataguiri

    264:42

    Against

    About: grant tax benefits and sectoral subsidies to large companies

    Zero, zero. Everything that has been a policy identical to this in the last 20 years in our country turned into profit in the hands of businessmen with influence here in Congress and at the Planalto — corrupt businessmen who form cartels, who form oligopolies; oligopolies and cartels that will become even easier with this law.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Accuses that benefits became profit for corrupt businessmen, forming cartels and oligopolies.

  28. Kim Kataguiri

    265:07

    Against

    About: report and approve bills in plenary

    This is one of the worst laws I have ever seen in this Legislature.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Labels the proposal as 'uma das piores leis' of the legislature (explicit opposition to approval).

  29. Kim Kataguiri

    265:11

    Against

    About: report and approve bills in plenary

    This is a disaster. It's a bomb. It's truly frightening that the majority of Parliament, in a quiet week, in a week when the voting is virtual, should vote for such an atrocity.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Says the proposal is 'um desastre' and criticizes its approval during a quiet week (clear opposition).

  30. Kim Kataguiri

    265:24

    Against

    About: require national content for capital goods and equipment

    We put here local content requirements, even when it comes to machines, equipment, systems...

    Why it was classified this way · 87% confidence Warns that local content requirements are being applied even to machinery and equipment.

  31. Kim Kataguiri

    265:37

    Against

    About: increase taxation on trade

    One of the dumbest things to do is to tax the import of capital goods.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Calls taxing the import of capital goods 'uma das coisas mais burras' (direct criticism).

  32. Kim Kataguiri

    265:53

    Against

    About: require national content for capital goods and equipment

    I am preventing the Brazilian entrepreneur from buying a machine that will produce more cheaply, that will produce with higher quality, in order to buy a more expensive machine that will produce worse.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence States that such a policy prevents entrepreneurs from buying cheaper, better machinery (explicit opposition).

  33. Kim Kataguiri

    266:03

    Against

    About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production

    So, Mr. President, this is a policy already proven to be a failure.

    Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Says this is 'uma política já comprovadamente fracassada' (critical opinion).

  34. Kim Kataguiri

    266:10

    Neutral

    About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production

    I'm not the one who says this. IPEA says this.

    Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Attributes the negative assessment to institutions (Ipea), citing who says it (reporting an authority).

  35. Kim Kataguiri

    266:12

    Neutral

    About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production

    FGV says this. The country's leading economists say this.

    Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Cites FGV and economists as sources of the criticism (description of institutional support).

  36. Kim Kataguiri

    266:17

    Against

    About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production

    It failed miserably and we now reinforce and endorse it in this session at the Chamber of Deputies.

    Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence States that the proposal 'fracassou miseravelmente' and that it is now being reinforced in the Chamber of Deputies (clear opposition).

  37. Kim Kataguiri

    267:55

    Against

    About: require BNDES criteria for national content in public procurement

    Once again I emphasize that we have here national content requirements, including when we talk about capital goods, with criteria established by BNDES and with the experience we have already had.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Alerts that criteria established by BNDES and previous experiences are being reproduced (critique).

  38. Kim Kataguiri

    268:09

    Against

    About: grant tax incentives that benefit large entrepreneurs

    In our country, this type of policy only served to take money out of the pockets of the poorest workers and put it into Eike Batista's pocket, to take money out of the poorest worker's pocket and put it into the pockets of the brothers Joesley and Wesley Batista.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Says the policy took money from workers and put it into the pockets of billionaires (explicit distributive criticism).

  39. Kim Kataguiri

    269:18

    Against

    About: favor unproductive markets with federal subsidies

    We are taking money from the poorest worker, giving this instrument to the Government to do this and putting it into the pocket of a corrupt businessman who has lobbying power in the National Congress and at the Planalto (Presidential Palace).

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Accuses that they are 'pegando o dinheiro público' to benefit corrupt businessmen (direct criticism).

  40. Kim Kataguiri

    269:32

    Against

    About: grant incentives that protect inefficient industries

    We are subsidizing inefficiency, we are protecting an industry that lives off siphoning public resources.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence States that they are 'subsidiando a ineficiência' and protecting an industry that lives off public funds.

  41. Kim Kataguiri

    270:06

    Against

    About: grant tax incentives and local content policies for industry

    We are taking public money and saying: 'Take this public money and produce worse and more expensive things.'

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Summarizes that the policy makes the public produce 'coisas piores e mais caras' (strong criticism).

  42. Kim Kataguiri

    270:18

    Against

    About: implement a competitiveness agenda to add value to Brazilian production

    I repeat, there is not a serious economist in this country who defends this institutional design.

    Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence States that there is no serious economist who defends that institutional design (denies technical support).

  43. Kim Kataguiri

    270:46

    Against

    About: schedule and vote on the amnesty proposal

    This disaster, apparently, is going to be approved, but not with my vote, never with my vote.

    Why it was classified this way · 93% confidence Declares that the disaster 'não será aprovado com o meu voto, jamais' (explicit denial of support).

AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology