Analyzed statements

Sessão Deliberativa Extraordinária Semipresencial (AM nº 123/2020)

38 classified statements · 1 politicians · November 4, 2025

Statements by Nikolas Ferreira. 38 excerpts classified by topic and stance. Topics: Family Rights, Social Policy, Tariff Policy, Media Regulation.

Speakers

  • Nikolas FerreiraNikolas Ferreira38

Classified statements

Excerpts classified by topic and stance. This is not the full transcript of the video.

  1. Nikolas Ferreira

    463:59

    For

    About: increase the duration of paternity leave

    Recently, I had 5 days of paternity leave and I couldn't actually have that extra time for caregiving, because by law it is not allowed for us, who are public servants, Deputies and Senators.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Says he couldn't have extra time because the law doesn't allow it, implying a needed change.

  2. Nikolas Ferreira

    464:13

    For

    About: increase the duration of paternity leave

    So, I think the free-market and family agendas are not opposed; on the contrary, they go hand in hand, and we know that present fathers create strong families.

    Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Associates free market and family and advocates present parents as public policy.

  3. Nikolas Ferreira

    464:25

    For

    About: increase the duration of paternity leave

    And the father, yes, can help — and a lot — during that period.

    Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence States the father can help a lot during the period, supporting paternal participation.

  4. Nikolas Ferreira

    464:45

    For

    About: increase the duration of paternity leave

    You can, obviously, carry your child, help with household chores in general, be present.

    Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence Lists a father's tasks (care, housework) and defends paternal presence.

  5. Nikolas Ferreira

    464:54

    For

    About: increase the duration of paternity leave

    We know that when the Brazilian family is strengthened, it obviously brings benefits to society as a whole, because the father returns to work more energized, mainly from having cared for his greatest asset, which is his family.

    Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence argues that strengthened families bring social benefits, supporting the measure.

  6. Nikolas Ferreira

    465:36

    For

    About: increase the duration of paternity leave

    This is a very important step to strengthen Brazilian families. Congratulations, Deputy Pedro! Thank you, Mr. President.

    Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence calls the initiative a very important step to strengthen families (explicit support).

  7. Nikolas Ferreira

    508:28

    For

    About: increase the duration of paternity leave

    Thank you, Mr. President. Not only as a Parliamentarian, but also as the father of two children, obviously I vote "yes".

    Why it was classified this way · 95% confidence explicitly declares 'oriento "sim"', voting in favor of the agenda.

  8. Nikolas Ferreira

    508:35

    Neutral

    About: adopt policies to stimulate population growth

    We know that Brazil's birth rate is 1.6 children, which is a concern for the market.

    Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence presents a birth rate of 1.6 as data, without an explicit proposal.

  9. Nikolas Ferreira

    508:42

    For

    About: increase the duration of paternity leave

    A medical worker, who works between 30 hours and 40 years, will be absent, at most, for 30 days in those 30 years or 40 years.

    Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence minimizes the impact of absences to justify granting leave.

  10. Nikolas Ferreira

    508:52

    For

    About: increase the duration of paternity leave

    We know that at the beginning of life the role of the father is very important.

    Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence states the importance of the father's role at the start of life, advocating paternal support.

  11. Nikolas Ferreira

    508:58

    Ambiguous

    About: increase the duration of paternity leave

    I say this because we know that some fathers can, in an unscrupulous way, use that time to do other things that are not related to being a father.

    Why it was classified this way · 55% confidence acknowledges misuse of the benefit, raising reservations about the proposal.

  12. Nikolas Ferreira

    509:06

    For

    About: increase the duration of paternity leave

    We cannot punish good fathers because of what bad fathers do.

    Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence argues against punishing good parents because of bad examples.

  13. Nikolas Ferreira

    509:11

    For

    About: increase the duration of paternity leave

    This is a very important advance. I want once again to congratulate the Rapporteur, Deputy Pedro Campos, and all who were involved in this process, and to say that present fathers create strong families.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence describes the measure as an important advance and congratulates the rapporteur (support).

  14. Nikolas Ferreira

    509:24

    For

    About: increase the duration of paternity leave

    This is a very important step to strengthen our greatest asset, which is our family. Thank you, Mr. President.

    Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence repeats that it is a step to strengthen the family, showing clear support.

  15. Nikolas Ferreira

    615:54

    Against

    About: increase consumption taxes

    "Oh, they'll tax foreign companies." But those foreign companies won't lose money, because they will pass all that cost on to the end consumer.

    Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence states that the tax will be passed on to the final consumer, criticizing the taxation.

  16. Nikolas Ferreira

    616:05

    Neutral

    About: increase consumption taxes

    Netflix was just hit by a stroke of the pen from the STF, which made a 10% tax apply, causing the company's shares to fall.

    Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence reports that STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) applied a 10% tax to Netflix and that its shares fell.

  17. Nikolas Ferreira

    616:14

    Against

    About: increase consumption taxes

    Obviously, that results in an increase in the subscription fee. On Amazon Prime now, you have to pay an extra amount to avoid seeing trailers and ads in the middle of the movie.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence says the measure results in higher subscription fees, arguing against it.

  18. Nikolas Ferreira

    616:24

    Against

    About: require public channels to be available on streaming platforms

    So it just keeps escalating. Specifically, we filed a motion regarding art. 8, §1, which addresses the following: when opening Disney+, HBO Max, Netflix, Deputy Sargento Gonçalves, it will be necessary to make available channels such as TV Câmara and TV Senado and a programming channel dedicated to health maintained by the public authorities.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence describes the obligation to make public channels available and criticizes the measure.

  19. Nikolas Ferreira

    616:54

    Against

    About: require public channels to be available on streaming platforms

    This is outrageous, people! I pay for streaming to escape that nonsense that often has political content.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence calls the requirement 'sacanagem' and rejects public content on paid streaming.

  20. Nikolas Ferreira

    617:02

    For

    About: guarantee consumer freedom of choice in streaming services

    People don't want that. Consumers should have the freedom to pay to not have public content in it.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence argues that consumers should be able to pay to avoid public content.

  21. Nikolas Ferreira

    617:15

    Against

    About: establish a 10% Brazilian content quota on streaming platforms

    Besides the points raised by Deputy Gayer, such as stipulating a 10% quota of Brazilian content, even though there are great films produced like O Auto da Compadecida, Dois Filhos de Francisco, Tropa de Elite and Tropa de Elite 2, which are excellent, on the other hand we know that this production will be used with a lot of tax money to serve as an ideological base for the Left.

    Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence claims that a quota funded by taxes will serve as an ideological basis for the Left.

  22. Nikolas Ferreira

    617:42

    For

    About: allocate public funds to the National Public Security Fund

    This money, in the order of 20 billion reais, could even be allocated to public security, to the National Public Security Fund, from which Lula used 10% of the resources last year or the year before.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence proposes that the ~20 billion be allocated to public security instead.

  23. Nikolas Ferreira

    618:11

    For

    About: reduce taxes with measures to offset revenue loss

    Have responsibility! The National Congress needs to stop voting only for tax increases and start becoming aware that the one being harmed by this is the end consumer.

    Why it was classified this way · 82% confidence asks that the National Congress stop voting only for tax increases that penalize consumers.

  24. Nikolas Ferreira

    618:24

    Against

    About: increase consumption taxes

    For the company it will matter little, because it will pass this charge on to the end consumer.

    Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence states that companies will pass the charge on to the final consumer.

  25. Nikolas Ferreira

    618:28

    Against

    About: require public channels to be available on streaming platforms

    Therefore, the recommendation is "no." Thank you, Mr. President.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence ends by saying the recommendation is 'não' to the measure discussed.

  26. Nikolas Ferreira

    625:56

    For

    About: allocate public funds to the National Public Security Fund

    Today, that money can be very well used in other places.

    Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence says this money could be used elsewhere, suggesting it be spent on security.

  27. Nikolas Ferreira

    652:13

    For

    About: protect consumers against pass-through of taxes by streaming platforms

    I want to put this day on the record so that when the platforms pass this cost on to consumers, they remember what we voted.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence sets a date to remind consumers when platforms pass on costs.

  28. Nikolas Ferreira

    652:38

    Against

    About: establish a 10% Brazilian content quota on streaming platforms

    No. You are ignoring supply and demand. This 10% quota for Brazilian films basically means ignoring what the market is.

    Why it was classified this way · 86% confidence says the 10% quota ignores supply and demand and disregards the market.

  29. Nikolas Ferreira

    652:52

    For

    About: protect consumers against pass-through of taxes by streaming platforms

    So I record here November 4 as the day on which, once again, a tax will be passed on to the consumer due to State interference even in the interface of television apps.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence marks the day as the moment when the fee will be passed on to the consumer by the State.

  30. Nikolas Ferreira

    661:02

    For

    About: reverse Federal Government decision that affects Apaes

    We need to send a message to the Apaes and overturn this decision of the Federal Government.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence explicitly calls to overturn the Federal Government's decision on the Apaes.

  31. Nikolas Ferreira

    661:07

    For

    About: classify criminal factions as terrorist organizations and deploy federal forces

    The second appeal concerns our impossibility of participating in the Committees where the Anti-Faction PL was on the agenda, of which I am the Rapporteur, to classify criminal organizations as terrorists.

    Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence declares they are the rapporteur of the PL that seeks to classify criminal organizations as terrorists.

  32. Nikolas Ferreira

    661:23

    For

    About: classify criminal factions as terrorist organizations and deploy federal forces

    This is very important, and tomorrow, since there will be no Committee work, I ask that we give an answer to the Brazilian people, especially at this time.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence asks for a response to the people and attention to the PL in the absence of committees.

  33. Nikolas Ferreira

    661:35

    For

    About: approve and implement the anti-faction law and the Public Security PEC to increase cooperation

    I have already put it in as urgent. With great honor I assigned it to Derrite, who has worked for years combating organized crime, to report here in the Plenary.

    Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence says they placed the issue under urgency to report it in the plenary.

  34. Nikolas Ferreira

    661:42

    For

    About: approve amnesty

    Finally, I appeal that amnesty be placed on the agenda.

    Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence makes an explicit appeal for amnesty to be put on the agenda.

  35. Nikolas Ferreira

    661:47

    For

    About: approve amnesty

    I believe this is a cry not only from the base, not only from the Opposition.

    Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence states that the call for amnesty is a widespread plea, not just from the base.

  36. Nikolas Ferreira

    661:54

    For

    About: approve amnesty

    I put myself in the position of children, mothers, fathers who are seeing their relatives being sentenced to 17 years in prison.

    Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence appeals as a son/family member of convicted persons, justifying amnesty.

  37. Nikolas Ferreira

    662:02

    For

    About: approve amnesty

    This is not proportional. Justice is in a hurry, and justice out of time is injustice.

    Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence argues that punishments are disproportionate and defends amnesty as a matter of justice.

  38. Nikolas Ferreira

    662:15

    For

    About: approve amnesty

    The Opposition is imbued with the purpose that the amnesty be passed still this month. Thank you, Mr. President.

    Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence declares that the Opposition wants the amnesty to pass this month.

AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology