Analyzed statements
Sessão Deliberativa Extraordinária Presencial (AM nº 123/2020)
29 classified statements · 1 politicians · September 16, 2025
Statements by Nikolas Ferreira. 29 excerpts classified by topic and stance. Topics: Parliamentarian Accountability, Voting Transparency, Combating Impunity, Judiciary.
Speakers
Nikolas Ferreira29
Classified statements
Excerpts classified by topic and stance. This is not the full transcript of the video.
Nikolas Ferreira
249:49
About: punish deputies who commit crimes
Mr. President, if any Deputy commits a crime, he will go to jail, yes.
Why it was classified this way · 92% confidence explicitly states that criminal deputies will go to jail.
Nikolas Ferreira
249:59
About: make votes on deputies' arrest public
All this House has to do is say "yes." Obviously, the secret ballot prevents the STF from blackmailing these Deputies here in order to free other Deputies.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence claims the secret ballot can enable blackmail by the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal).
Nikolas Ferreira
250:11
About: hold accountable and punish those who disobey the law
In that Brazil, it seems that a corrupt Deputy is going to jail.
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence states that 'parece' that the corrupt will go to jail, without proposing any action.
Nikolas Ferreira
250:15
About: arrest corrupt people
Which one? If corruption put people in jail, Lula would not be in the Presidency, he would be in jail.
Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence Makes a sarcastic remark about impunity, without proposing policy.
Nikolas Ferreira
250:21
About: hold accountable and punish those who disobey the law
What we are arguing here today is very simple: corrupt people in this House, the "bribe-splitters", those who actually commit crimes are not going to jail.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence Describes that corrupt people in the House are not going to jail.
Nikolas Ferreira
250:33
About: approve a PEC to limit STF's authority over deputies
Now it will not be necessary for any PT "Procurador" Deputy to keep activating the STF so that elected Deputies, representatives of the people, are unseated, no.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Says there will be no need to involve the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal); he wants the decision to pass through the Chamber of Deputies.
Nikolas Ferreira
250:43
About: approve a PEC to limit STF's authority over deputies
The decision will have to go through us now.
Why it was classified this way · 84% confidence States that the decision will now have to pass through the House.
Nikolas Ferreira
250:45
About: punish deputies who commit crimes
If someone committed a crime, we'll vote here in favor of that guy being imprisoned.
Why it was classified this way · 95% confidence Proposes to vote in favor of imprisoning those who committed crimes.
Nikolas Ferreira
252:13
About: maintain secret vote of STF ministers
Mr. President, I quote this headline: "Lula defends secret ballot of STF ministers."
Why it was classified this way · 72% confidence Quotes a headline reporting a defense of secret voting, without opining.
Nikolas Ferreira
252:29
About: make votes on deputies' arrest public
Now, for a Deputy who wants to put a corrupt criminal in jail, a secret ballot cannot be used.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence States that secret voting 'não pode' when one wants to imprison a corrupt person.
Nikolas Ferreira
253:09
About: approve a PEC to limit STF's authority over deputies
Are we going to fall for that tale? No way. Let's move forward and approve this "thing."
Why it was classified this way · 86% confidence Asks to approve 'esse trem', referring to the shielding PEC.
Nikolas Ferreira
291:03
About: investigate and punish those responsible for the assassination of Marielle Franco
Mr. President, this week an incident that reverberated worldwide occurred: a 31-year-old man, father of two children, was killed in cold blood.
Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence Reports a homicide case and its repercussions without proposing a specific policy.
Nikolas Ferreira
291:31
About: protect the right to life and punish violence motivated by ideology
However absurd something a person may defend, I don't think that person deserves to be shot for it.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence States that no one deserves to be shot for defending ideas.
Nikolas Ferreira
293:13
About: combat organized crime
We know that, after all, organized crime has taken over our country and that 50 million people live under the yoke of the rules of organized crime in Brazil.
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence Reports the scope of organized crime without detailing concrete measures.
Nikolas Ferreira
293:37
About: combat organized crime
We know that this type of criminal organization needs to be fought more vigorously here in our country.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Explicitly says that organized crime needs to be fought more vigorously.
Nikolas Ferreira
333:21
About: punish deputies who commit crimes
You said it perfectly. The English is correct. Mr. President, the other Deputy over there thinks that, by speaking more calmly, he will present my melodramatic words as if they were a crime: "Wow, look at the crime Nikolas committed!" If any Deputy commits a crime, we will make sure he is held accountable for it.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Repeats that criminal deputies will be held accountable for their acts.
Nikolas Ferreira
333:44
About: punish deputies who commit crimes
Wasn't that what happened, for example, with Flordelis?
Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence Invokes Flordelis's removal as a precedent in support of punishment.
Nikolas Ferreira
333:47
About: punish deputies who commit crimes
She committed a crime, and we decided to strip her of her office, to revoke her mandate.
Why it was classified this way · 72% confidence Reaffirms that the House punished those who committed crimes (expulsion).
Nikolas Ferreira
333:59
About: approve a PEC to limit STF's authority over deputies
You are saying that if this PEC passes, the corrupt will no longer be arrested.
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence Reports an opposing argument about the PEC's effects without endorsing it.
Nikolas Ferreira
334:11
About: make votes on deputies' arrest public
At least this kind of vote prevents blackmail against Deputies who want to put bandits and criminals behind bars.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Argues that open voting prevents blackmail of deputies.
Nikolas Ferreira
384:49
About: approve a PEC to limit STF's authority over deputies
Yes! We really want to be shielded from an STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) that acts as a political agent against members of this House, opening inquiries, carrying out searches and seizures because of words spoken.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Declares wanting to 'ser blindados' against the political action of the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal).
Nikolas Ferreira
385:21
About: punish deputies who commit crimes
Now, what are they afraid of? Whoever commits a crime will pay, uai!
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Categorically states that whoever commits a crime will pay for it.
Nikolas Ferreira
385:26
About: punish deputies who commit crimes
It's that simple: we vote and show that this House is against criminals.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Proposes to vote to show that the House is against criminals.
Nikolas Ferreira
407:28
About: approve a PEC to limit STF's authority over deputies
Mr. President, the proposal is not ideal, but it is the feasible one.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Concedes it's an imperfect proposal but supports its approval.
Nikolas Ferreira
407:42
About: approve a PEC to limit STF's authority over deputies
You don't need to convince me anymore! I am already going to vote in favor of the measure.
Why it was classified this way · 95% confidence Explicitly declares he will vote in favor of the measure.
Nikolas Ferreira
407:50
About: make votes on deputies' arrest public
Are you kidding me? "Oh, they'll vote without anyone knowing." Obviously!
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Counters criticism of open voting and defends transparency.
Nikolas Ferreira
407:55
About: approve a PEC to limit STF's authority over deputies
The STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) blackmails a bunch of Deputies and Senators, interferes in the decisions of this Congress, including in the decisions of the President of this House, opens and closes inquiries at its whim.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence States that the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) interferes and opens inquiries, justifying limitation.
Nikolas Ferreira
408:10
About: approve a PEC to limit STF's authority over deputies
If they want to take away our prerogatives, let's take away theirs.
Why it was classified this way · 82% confidence Proposes to retaliate against the removal of prerogatives by limiting the actions of the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal).
Nikolas Ferreira
408:13
About: approve a PEC to limit STF's authority over deputies
Point! The instruction is to vote "yes", Mr. President.
Why it was classified this way · 96% confidence Explicitly directs a 'sim' vote, supporting approval of the PEC.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology