Analyzed statements
Sessão Deliberativa Extraordinária Presencial (AM nº 123/2020)
25 classified statements · 1 politicians · August 20, 2025
Statements by Nikolas Ferreira. 25 excerpts classified by topic and stance. Topics: Human rights, Party Communication, Child and adolescent protection, Digital environment regulation.
Speakers
Nikolas Ferreira25
Classified statements
Excerpts classified by topic and stance. This is not the full transcript of the video.
Nikolas Ferreira
129:21
About: approve a vote of condemnation for human rights violations committed by the STF
He even brought here a bill with a vote of condemnation for the human rights violations that the STF has committed, especially in the person of Minister Alexandre de Moraes.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence reports that a deputy brought a bill of condemnation; describes the proposal without explicit support.
Nikolas Ferreira
129:41
About: expand right-wing candidacies
I thank you, I thank Partido Chega, André Ventura, Rita Matias and other Deputies who also make up this great party and who have done excellent work in Portugal with the youth, showing that, indeed, conservatives have a voice.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence praises Partido Chega and says conservatives have a voice, supporting its actions.
Nikolas Ferreira
129:58
About: promote conservative agendas
We are the majority and what we, in fact, need is to persist and carry on.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence says 'Nós somos maioria' and calls to persist and continue, defending conservative political action.
Nikolas Ferreira
457:00
About: approve measures to protect children and adolescents online
Thank you, Mr. President. Mr. President, I take the floor at this moment only to make some clarifications regarding Bill No. 2,628 of 2022.
Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence announces they will provide clarifications about the PL (Liberal Party), without yet proposing a vote or final position.
Nikolas Ferreira
457:10
About: approve measures to protect children and adolescents online
Previously, in fact there was no possibility of consensus regarding this text, but since yesterday I have been speaking with Deputy Jadyel Alencar about several points, which I want to clarify here.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence reports negotiations and a previous lack of consensus over the bill's text.
Nikolas Ferreira
457:22
About: approve measures to protect children and adolescents online
First, we have here a modification regarding "national authority", a subjective term.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence describes a proposed modification in the text about 'autoridade nacional' without evaluating it.
Nikolas Ferreira
457:28
About: approve measures to protect children and adolescents online
We changed it, together with Deputy Jadyel Alencar, to this: "Autonomous administrative authority for the protection of the rights of children and adolescents in the digital environment".
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence says 'Alteramos' in the first person, claiming and defending the new wording.
Nikolas Ferreira
457:37
About: approve measures to protect children and adolescents online
Regarding art. 6, we were concerned about the expression "offensive content".
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence expresses concern about the phrase 'conteúdo ofensivo' without proposing an immediate solution.
Nikolas Ferreira
457:42
About: approve measures to protect children and adolescents online
What would that be? Various segments of our political spectrum, especially the Christian segment, were worried about this.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence reports that Christian sectors became worried about the definition of 'ofensivo'.
Nikolas Ferreira
457:49
About: approve measures to regulate and remove harmful content on digital platforms
Article 6 specifies, it provides a list of the matters that can in fact be cited for the takedown of content or even a person's profile.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence explains that art. 6 contains a list of what allows content takedown.
Nikolas Ferreira
458:02
About: approve measures to remove sexual exploitation and abuse content and other harmful material from digital platforms
Among them are — and I will not cite them all, so as not to take too much time — sexual exploitation and abuse; physical violence, systematic virtual intimidation and harassment; promotion and commercialization of gambling; predatory advertising practices; and pornographic content.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence lists types of content that 'não deveriam estar na rede', supporting removal.
Nikolas Ferreira
458:17
About: approve measures to remove sexual exploitation and abuse content and other harmful material from digital platforms
A list was produced of what is truly offensive and should not be on the internet.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence states that the list defines what is offensive and should not be online.
Nikolas Ferreira
458:23
About: guarantee freedom of expression on social networks and not adopt a foreign censorship model
Paragraph 1 of art. 34 says the following: among the regulations, "practices against fundamental rights, freedom of expression, privacy, comprehensive protection and the differentiated treatment of the personal data of children and adolescents are being prohibited".
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence quotes a passage that forbids practices against fundamental rights and freedom of expression.
Nikolas Ferreira
458:39
About: limit who is entitled to report content on digital platforms
Finally, I want to say that previously it was stated in the report, Deputy Jadyel Alencar, that everyone could report.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence reports that previously it stated that everyone could report, without evaluating it yet.
Nikolas Ferreira
458:46
About: limit who is entitled to report content on digital platforms
This, on the Internet, as we know, would provoke a barrage of reports.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence states that allowing everyone to report would create a 'bangue-bangue' of reports, arguing for limitation.
Nikolas Ferreira
458:50
About: approve measures to remove child abuse media from online platforms
Both sides would report in their own interest, which does not combat what we really want to combat, namely those child abuse media, which we want to remove from virtual platforms.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence explicitly says they want to 'tirar' child abuse media off platforms.
Nikolas Ferreira
459:03
About: limit who is entitled to report content on digital platforms
Deputy Jadyel — and I thank him very much — specified the parties entitled to do this.
Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence praises the rapporteur for specifying who may report, showing support for the measure.
Nikolas Ferreira
459:09
About: limit who is entitled to report content on digital platforms
Who are they? Parents, legal guardians, the MPF and organizations that protect children and adolescents.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence lists parents, the MP and organizations as legitimized, indicating approval of the limitation.
Nikolas Ferreira
459:14
About: clarify and debate the text approved in the Chamber of Deputies before voting
So, once again I say: those who did not have the competence or the availability and the attention to speak with the Rapporteur, forgive me, cannot come here and say that the text, on this little point...
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence criticizes those who didn't speak with the rapporteur and defends that there was dialogue.
Nikolas Ferreira
459:34
About: clarify and debate the text approved in the Chamber of Deputies before voting
MR. NIKOLAS FERREIRA (Bloc/PL - MG) - You cannot say "as for this specific point I do not agree", given that it was, indeed, discussed.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence says it was discussed and it's not valid to disagree without dialogue with the rapporteur.
Nikolas Ferreira
459:44
About: approve measures to protect children and adolescents online
Previously there was no consensus, but now there is. We cannot establish that, because the bill is not literally ideal, we will brand — and perhaps the Left will brand us — that we do not want to defend children, that the Right brands the bill as "censorship".
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence rejects the label 'censura' and says they want to defend the children.
Nikolas Ferreira
460:01
About: approve measures to protect children and adolescents online
There was balance, there was a common denominator. I hope, obviously, that the bill will not be used in the future for something worse.
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence says they support the text but hopes it won't be used in the future for something worse.
Nikolas Ferreira
460:08
About: approve measures to protect children and adolescents online
Until now, what is in this bill, I have no doubt, meets what we want, which is to protect children and adolescents.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence states without doubt that the bill aligns with protecting children and adolescents.
Nikolas Ferreira
460:18
About: approve measures to protect children and adolescents online
Previously it did not meet that. That is the truth about the bill.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence contrasts a previous version of the bill, describing the change without proposing new action.
Nikolas Ferreira
460:28
About: politically engage with conservative religious caucuses
I thank the other Parliamentarians, Deputy Bia Kicis, Deputy Domingos Sávio, and the evangelical, Catholic and Christian benches.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence thanks the evangelical, Catholic and Christian benches, indicating support for the coordination.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology