Analyzed statements
Sessão Deliberativa Extraordinária Semipresencial (AM nº 123/2020)
36 classified statements · 1 politicians · July 14, 2026
Statements by Nikolas Ferreira. 36 excerpts classified by topic and stance. Topics: Judiciary and Public Spending, Anti-Discrimination, Investment Policy, Public Service.
Speakers
Nikolas Ferreira36
Classified statements
Excerpts classified by topic and stance. This is not the full transcript of the video.
Nikolas Ferreira
19:04
About: ensure transparency and oversight in the use of public funds in foreign relations
Janja just said that the nickname "gastadeira" (big spender), to her, is misogyny — that is, if you, a Brazilian worker, wake up early and sleep late, and feel disrespected by someone who doesn't hold public office but uses public structures to even have a parallel office that has already cost 1.2 million of your money, and you want to criticize her for blowing people’s money on luxurious international trips, you're misogynistic.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Criticizes use of public facilities and high spending, demanding accountability.
Nikolas Ferreira
19:45
About: criminalize hate against women
I don't know if you know that, while you pay more for travel and gasoline, while food is being reduced — now the Bis isn't even stacked one on top of another, no, it's just one — while you are working, do you know what Congress is worried about?
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Contrasts Congress' priorities, criticizing the criminalization of misogyny.
Nikolas Ferreira
19:58
About: criminalize hate against women
Criminalizing misogyny, with the fallacy that this is to protect women.
Why it was classified this way · 92% confidence Says that Congress wants to criminalize misogyny and criticizes that initiative.
Nikolas Ferreira
20:12
About: ensure transparency and oversight in the use of public funds in foreign relations
A person who takes trips to Italy, Paris, London, Abu Dhabi, and a Government that has already spent 7 billion on international travel...
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Cites a 7 billion expenditure to criticize spending and call for greater transparency.
Nikolas Ferreira
20:30
About: increase investments in education, health, and public infrastructure
Do you know how many schools could be built, how many highways could be structured, how many hospitals could be renovated and how many things could be done with that money?
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Lists schools, highways, and hospitals as alternative uses for the funds.
Nikolas Ferreira
20:40
About: improve public management
But no. Here in Brazil, as I always say, it's not money that's missing, it's shame, it's character, it's good administration.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Criticizes lack of character and poor administration, calling for better public management.
Nikolas Ferreira
21:08
About: ensure transparency and oversight in the use of public funds in foreign relations
And it doesn't stop there. Lula, not satisfied with having someone enjoying public money, even put the trip that funded Janja's visit to New York in 2024 under secrecy — he did not provide information about it.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Accuses secrecy about a trip and demands accounting for the expenses.
Nikolas Ferreira
21:24
About: invest in materials and personnel to execute infrastructure works
So on one side you have people working to survive in a country that has no security, no education, no health care.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Contrasts public suffering with government expenditures, calling for prioritization of services.
Nikolas Ferreira
21:38
About: ensure transparency and oversight in the use of public funds in foreign relations
On the other side, you have Janja dancing on the COP 30 yacht, also sustained with your money.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Criticizes the first lady's presence on a yacht paid for with public funds.
Nikolas Ferreira
21:45
About: criminalize hate against women
So here we go. You can't criticize a biological man who is President of the Women's Commission, because otherwise it's misogyny.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence States that the law would limit criticism of authorities, rejecting the measure.
Nikolas Ferreira
21:52
About: criminalize hate against women
You can't "impeach" Dilma, who committed fiscal misconduct, because otherwise that's misogyny too.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Uses the example of impeachment to argue the law would bar past criticisms.
Nikolas Ferreira
22:00
About: ensure transparency and oversight in the use of public funds in foreign relations
You can't criticize Janja's absurd spending, because otherwise it's misogyny.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Says that criticizing the first lady's spending would be labeled misogyny, defending transparency.
Nikolas Ferreira
22:06
About: criminalize hate against women
You can't criticize the misogyny bill, because otherwise it's misogyny.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Reiterates that criticizing the bill would be labeled misogyny, criticizing its breadth.
Nikolas Ferreira
22:15
About: criminalize hate against women
Gentlemen, what's the danger of this? People aren't understanding that equating this with racism is equivalent to a crime.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence States that equating it with racism would imply criminalization, criticizing the bill.
Nikolas Ferreira
22:25
About: criminalize hate against women
The rapporteur of this bill comes online to boast: "Ah, I have legislative output, I've already passed so many laws."
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Criticizes the rapporteur and downplays the legislative output, rejecting the bill.
Nikolas Ferreira
22:38
About: criminalize hate against women
And she literally wants to criminalize — to give you an idea — people, children who use terms with each other like "betinha."
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Warns about criminalizing terms among children, criticizing the scope of the proposal.
Nikolas Ferreira
22:52
About: criminalize hate against women
We are so without concerns today in Brazil that Congress has to approve, by urgent procedure, a bill that wants to criminalize misogyny now.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Criticizes Congress's urgency to approve a bill that criminalizes misogyny.
Nikolas Ferreira
23:08
About: investigate and punish cases of sexual harassment by authorities
Oh really? They discovered women now, because when Silvio, Minister of Human Rights in the Lula Government, harassed another Minister in the Lula Government, this chamber was like this: total silence.
Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence Cites harassment by a minister and lack of response, demanding effective punishment.
Nikolas Ferreira
23:24
About: criminalize hate against women
No one said anything. I didn't see a note of repudiation, I didn't see outraged artists, I didn't see fiery speeches from the podium saying: "This is a case of misogyny, it's an attack on women." Now, calling someone "betinha" is more likely to get you jailed than a Minister harassing another Minister.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Compares serious harassment with lesser insults, criticizing the priorities of criminalization.
Nikolas Ferreira
24:05
About: increase penalties for heinous crimes
Increasing penalties for heinous crimes. Do you know what heinous crimes are?
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Points to the left's opposing vote and advocates increased penalties for heinous crimes.
Nikolas Ferreira
24:17
About: increase penalties for heinous crimes
And what are they doing? Voting against that measure.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Accuses parties of voting against tougher penalties, defending the measure.
Nikolas Ferreira
24:38
About: criminalize hate against women
The rapporteur of this bill wants to criminalize jokes, because for a comedian there's a place in jail, for someone who wears a wig here in the chamber there's jail.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Says the bill would criminalize jokes and comedians, rejecting the proposal.
Nikolas Ferreira
25:27
About: reduce the age of criminal responsibility to 16 years
Really, this is unbelievable. The same Left, that wants to criminalize jokes, criminalize that you criticize someone who is burning your money, is against lowering the age of criminal responsibility.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence States that lowering the age of criminal responsibility would protect women, expressing support.
Nikolas Ferreira
25:46
About: reduce the age of criminal responsibility to 16 years
Recently, boys, minors, criminals, scumbags, abused two children of 7 and 10 years old.
Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence Reports abuse committed by minors without directly proposing an action in this sentence.
Nikolas Ferreira
25:53
About: issue an official statement on serious crimes
What was the outrage? The President of the Republic is eager to talk about Neymar, eager to talk about Trump, but cases that really matter like this get total silence.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Criticizes the government's silence and calls for a stance on cases that matter.
Nikolas Ferreira
26:15
About: criminalize hate against women
None. I ask: Does this bill really want to protect women?
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Questions whether the bill truly protects women and concludes it does not.
Nikolas Ferreira
26:25
About: ensure processing of bills that regulate social media
So we need, therefore, to regulate the networks.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Proposes regulating social networks in response to what they denounce as control of speech.
Nikolas Ferreira
26:36
About: criminalize misogyny
They still want to do this before the elections. Obviously, if someone makes a video, with a black background, showing the Lula Government's spending, Janja's spending, showing how several women on the Left are hypocritical in their votes and their rhetoric, that will be misogyny.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Says that spending complaints would be turned into accusations of misogyny, criticizing suppression.
Nikolas Ferreira
27:11
About: reduce the age of criminal responsibility to 16 years
That protects women my foot. What protects women, for example, is lowering the age of criminal responsibility.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence States explicitly that lowering the age of criminal responsibility protects women.
Nikolas Ferreira
27:17
About: require full enforcement of sentences and restrict benefits for prisoners
What protects women is not letting rapists and pedophiles leave prison.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Argues for not letting rapists and pedophiles out of prison as a form of protection.
Nikolas Ferreira
28:04
About: reduce homicides in the country
In fact, we are at a record level of femicide.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Cites record levels of femicide and complains about lack of proposals, indicating need for action.
Nikolas Ferreira
28:26
About: criminalize hate against women
I said earlier that I would not only vote — and I voted against this bill — I'm working so that this bill will not be voted on.
Why it was classified this way · 95% confidence States they voted against the bill and are working to prevent its passage.
Nikolas Ferreira
28:46
About: criminalize hate against women
I know what's going to happen. Any news that shows aggression, something bad or a crime against a woman, they'll say that if they had approved the PL da Misoginia, this wouldn't have happened, or that Deputy Nikolas voted against protecting that woman.
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence Refers to the expected narrative about their vote without proposing new action in this sentence.
Nikolas Ferreira
29:07
About: criminalize hate against women
But the fact is that if a bill is being supported by Janja, you can be sure that now it has become much easier to vote for.
Why it was classified this way · 95% confidence Says that if the bill comes to the floor, they will explicitly vote 'não'.
Nikolas Ferreira
29:14
About: criminalize hate against women
If this comes to the Plenary, obviously we will vote "no".
Why it was classified this way · 95% confidence Reaffirms intention to vote 'não' on the bill, considering it deceptive.
Nikolas Ferreira
29:40
About: approve measures that protect women against violence
Want to do something real for women? Start by making your votes here coherent.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Appeals for consistency in votes as a real way to protect women.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology