Analyzed statements
Sessão Deliberativa Extraordinária Presencial (AM nº 123/2020)
22 classified statements · 1 politicians · May 26, 2026
Statements by Kim Kataguiri. 22 excerpts classified by topic and stance. Topics: Political Violence & Impunity, Public Safety and Order, Political Rights, Digital environment regulation.
Speakers
Kim Kataguiri22
Classified statements
Excerpts classified by topic and stance. This is not the full transcript of the video.
Kim Kataguiri
149:16
About: approve a bill that protects against gender-based political violence
Mr. President, Members of the Chamber of Deputies, the bill, as set out in its summary, intends to protect against gender-based political violence.
Why it was classified this way · 72% confidence Summarizes the bill's summary without expressing support or opposition.
Kim Kataguiri
149:26
About: guarantee protection for Black political leaders and activists
But when you read the text, you see there are some jabutis in it, for example the inclusion of special protection and privileges, in reality, for leaders who will be placed above ordinary citizens.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Criticizes 'jabutis' that create legal privileges for leaders.
Kim Kataguiri
149:40
About: grant special police protection and priority attention from the Public Prosecutor's Office to leaders
So, leaders of human rights NGOs, party leaders, will receive special treatment from the police, often with guaranteed police escorts and attention from the Public Prosecutor's Office, more than an ordinary citizen.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence States that the text provides for police escort and attention from the Public Ministry to leaders.
Kim Kataguiri
149:55
About: grant special police protection and priority attention from the Public Prosecutor's Office to leaders
Personally, I don't think there should be any legal privilege or special police protection or special attention from the Public Prosecutor for any representative, just because he is part of a human rights NGO.
Why it was classified this way · 92% confidence Explicitly states disagreement with legal privileges or special protection.
Kim Kataguiri
150:10
About: grant police escort to leaders provided for by law
The law guarantees them police escorts.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence States that the law guarantees police escort, describing the legal content.
Kim Kataguiri
150:25
About: regulate algorithmic manipulation and content boosting on social networks
There are also other absolutely subjective points regarding artificial manipulation of algorithms, boosting.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence Points to 'subjetivos' aspects regarding manipulation of algorithms as a problem.
Kim Kataguiri
150:35
About: ensure that content removal on social networks respects due process and adversarial rights
Recently, we had an illegal decree by the Lula Government granting superpowers to the Attorney General's Office and to the ANPD to take social media content down concerning opinions about the Government's public policies, which can be analyzed subjectively, without the right to a judicial process, without adversarial proceedings, without full defense.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Criticizes a decree that would allow removal without judicial process; argues the opposite.
Kim Kataguiri
150:56
About: authorize public bodies to remove social media content without a court order
Once again, there is the text of a law here that, if approved, increases the subjective power to censor speech on social networks.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Says the draft law would increase subjective power for censorship on social media.
Kim Kataguiri
151:11
About: criminalize statements that belittle or denigrate gender identity
Another point here, once again raising an always-controversial topic in this chamber, about respect for gender identity — anything that belittles or that has the character of denigrating gender identity.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Expresses concern about criminalizing opinions on gender identity.
Kim Kataguiri
151:27
About: impose legal limits on freedom of expression
Well, if I say, for example, that a trans woman is a biological man, would that be classified as a crime under the law?
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Asks whether stating that a trans woman is a 'homem biológico' would be a crime.
Kim Kataguiri
151:35
About: require digital platforms to remove content without a court order
Will my remark, this speech of mine, be censored?
Why it was classified this way · 82% confidence Questions whether their online speech would be censored, signaling opposition.
Kim Kataguiri
151:37
About: criminalize speech made in religious institutions about gender identity
If in a church, for example, there is some statement regarding gender identity, could that be criminalized, could it be censored?
Why it was classified this way · 86% confidence Asks whether speeches in church about gender identity could be criminalized.
Kim Kataguiri
151:45
About: guarantee protection for Black political leaders and activists
Once again, Mr. President, under the noble, just and worthy pretext of promoting protection for women, there are passages that are absolutely subjective and outside the scope of the matter that grant the privilege of police escort and attention from the MPF to people who are part of certain NGOs — privileges I see no reason for — and also a curtailment of freedom of expression on social networks and, once again, especially regarding gender identity, which is why I instruct against it and request a roll-call vote, Mr. President.
Why it was classified this way · 91% confidence Summarizes criticisms of the text and directs a vote against due to legal privileges.
Kim Kataguiri
159:59
About: grant special police protection and priority attention from the Public Prosecutor's Office to leaders
We have here special attention from the Police and the MPF for union leaders, for those who hold leadership positions in private institutions.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence States that special attention from the police and the MP would reach various leaders.
Kim Kataguiri
160:07
About: grant special police protection and priority attention from the Public Prosecutor's Office to leaders
Yes, for a businessman, for a businesswoman, there will be special attention from the Police, from the MPF!
Why it was classified this way · 89% confidence Emphasizes that businesspeople would receive special attention from the State.
Kim Kataguiri
160:16
About: grant protective measures without requiring a police report
It's the granting of a protective measure without a police report, based on a subjective criterion.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Criticizes granting protective measures without a police report, calling it subjective.
Kim Kataguiri
160:22
About: approve the bill under discussion
Thus, I would even make an appeal to colleagues in the opposition to enter a "no" instruction on the panel against this bill that aims to give special protection by the Police to union leaders, to leaders of NGOs who criticize the Police.
Why it was classified this way · 92% confidence Appeals to the opposition to direct a 'não' vote against the bill.
Kim Kataguiri
160:37
About: grant priority service from the Public Prosecutor's Office to certain leaders
Priority at the MPF is not reasonable and has nothing to do with protection of women, folks!
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Says that giving priority in the MP is not reasonable nor related to protecting women.
Kim Kataguiri
160:41
About: approve the bill under discussion
The Opposition has the duty to vote against this bill, the text is bad, the text goes beyond what was in the original bill, there are points that are unrelated to this. Missão's instruction is "no", Mr. President.
Why it was classified this way · 95% confidence States that the Opposition has a duty to vote against and directs 'não'.
Kim Kataguiri
278:02
About: approve the bill under discussion
Mr. President, just to state Missão's "yes" instruction.
Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence Reports a group's ('Missão') orientation as 'sim' without giving its own judgment.
Kim Kataguiri
278:04
About: approve the bill under discussion
When it's a good bill we speak little so we can vote right away.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Says that with a good bill one should vote quickly, suggesting support.
Kim Kataguiri
278:08
About: approve the bill under discussion
Parliament has already approved this measure in that sense; unfortunately President Lula vetoed it, but now we bring this progress. "Yes", Mr. President.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Cites a previous veto and says 'Sim', explicitly expressing support for approval.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology