Analyzed statements
Sessão Deliberativa Extraordinária Presencial (AM nº 123/2020)
82 classified statements · 1 politicians · October 15, 2025
Statements by Nikolas Ferreira. 82 excerpts classified by topic and stance. Topics: Disability Rights, Criticism of federal government, Public Safety and Order, Executive-Congress Relations.
Speakers
Nikolas Ferreira82
Classified statements
Excerpts classified by topic and stance. This is not the full transcript of the video.
Nikolas Ferreira
166:04
About: recognize type 1 diabetes as a disability
Thank you, Mr. President. I come here to make an appeal to Senator Davi Alcolumbre to schedule the veto regarding Bill No. 2,687 of 2022, which recognizes type 1 diabetes as a disability.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence asks to put the veto on the agenda to explicitly secure this right.
Nikolas Ferreira
166:18
About: recognize type 1 diabetes as a disability
This right is already guaranteed by the Statute of the Person with Disabilities.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence states that the right is already guaranteed by the Statute (factual report).
Nikolas Ferreira
166:23
About: recognize type 1 diabetes as a disability
This was approved by this Congress, but Lula, under sordid and unscrupulous arguments of bureaucracy, vetoed the bill, harming millions of people who depend on state assistance.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence criticizes the presidential veto and says it harms millions, defending the law.
Nikolas Ferreira
166:37
About: recognize type 1 diabetes as a disability
Now the matter is in the hands of Senator Davi Alcolumbre, President of the National Congress, who can schedule the veto on this bill so that we Deputies and Senators, through our vote, can secure this right for people with type 1 diabetes.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence calls on the president of the National Congress to put the veto on the agenda to guarantee the right.
Nikolas Ferreira
166:55
About: recognize type 1 diabetes as a disability
Therefore, I ask people to continue pressuring Senator Davi Alcolumbre.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence makes a public appeal to pressure a Senator to put the veto on the agenda.
Nikolas Ferreira
166:59
About: recognize type 1 diabetes as a disability
I have no doubt that we will guarantee this right to these people. Thank you, Mr. President.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence states conviction that they will secure the right (statement of intent).
Nikolas Ferreira
253:00
About: defeat the PT government in the next elections
Thank you, Mr. President. The PT is exhausting. This is the feeling, I believe, of every Brazilian who has at minimum two neurons, a heart and a brain, who has felt this weariness day after day because of a Government that blames everyone except itself.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence declares fatigue with PT and criticizes the government, suggesting electoral opposition.
Nikolas Ferreira
253:19
About: improve the Federal Government's performance
I have a question for you, gentlemen: what has improved under this Government in recent years?
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence asks a rhetorical question about improvements in the government, without proposing concrete action.
Nikolas Ferreira
253:29
About: combat organized crime
Absolutely nothing! We have, in terms of public security, more than 50 million people under the yoke of organized crime.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence presents a statistic on victims of organized crime (factual report).
Nikolas Ferreira
253:41
About: combat organized crime
If you do not obey the rules of organized crime, you are punished, suffer physical consequences, have to leave your home, as has happened in a large part, if not the entirety, of Ceará.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence describes consequences of organized crime without proposing a specific measure.
Nikolas Ferreira
253:57
About: change the presidential stance on public security
We see a President of the Republic who, all the time, portrays himself as if he were a peacemaker, always setting up "us against them."
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence criticizes the President's stance as 'pacificador' and divisive ('nós contra eles').
Nikolas Ferreira
254:06
About: promote public policies that generate national progress
In truth, there is no progress for the country, only persecution, only provocation.
Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence says there is no progress, criticizes persecution, and calls for the country's advancement.
Nikolas Ferreira
254:13
About: assume government responsibility instead of blaming the National Congress
Now he comes and says that the blame for everything in our country lies with the Congress and that there has never been a Congress so low in history.
Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence reports that the President blames the National Congress, without a direct proposal.
Nikolas Ferreira
254:22
About: investigate and punish corruption in public administration
A good Congress, to him, was the Congress of the parliamentarians he bought with the mensalão.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence accuses the buying of parliamentarians in the past, advocating accountability.
Nikolas Ferreira
254:26
About: investigate and punish corruption in public administration
A good Congress was one in which a Deputy was caught with suitcases of money inside his apartment.
Why it was classified this way · 68% confidence supports examples of suitcases of cash, demanding action against corruption.
Nikolas Ferreira
254:31
About: investigate and punish corruption in public administration
A good Congress, in Lula's view, was that of the times when the branches of power had harmony and corruption was, day after day, normal for the Government.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence attributes the normalization of corruption to a previous period, calling for accountability.
Nikolas Ferreira
254:41
About: prioritize and strengthen public safety policies to retake territory
Public security in our country, unfortunately, has been neglected and run down.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence states the degradation of public security and calls for attention to the issue.
Nikolas Ferreira
254:47
About: ensure Federal Police action against organized crime and corruption
There is also a part of the Federal Police succumbing to the STF, especially to Minister Alexandre de Moraes, rendering itself not to fight organized crime and corruption, but to keep persecuting Parliamentarians, which has been this Government's priority.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence criticizes the Federal Police as having succumbed to the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) and accuses it of prioritizing the persecution of parliamentarians.
Nikolas Ferreira
255:04
About: improve public transportation
Now I ask you, simply: how is public transportation in your city?
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence asks a rhetorical question about the state of transport without proposing direct measures.
Nikolas Ferreira
255:12
About: improve the public health network (hospitals and UBS)
How are healthcare, hospitals and basic health units doing in terms of improvement and progress in what is fundamental for our country?
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence asks about advances in health, listing services without proposing concrete measures.
Nikolas Ferreira
255:21
About: increase municipal basic sanitation coverage
We have 100 million people without basic sanitation.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence presents the number of people without sanitation (factual report).
Nikolas Ferreira
255:23
About: schedule and vote on the amnesty proposal
The amnesty, which is supposed to be put on the agenda here, is never brought up.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence says amnesty is not on the agenda and that it should be put on the agenda.
Nikolas Ferreira
255:27
About: prioritize spending on essential public policies
We need to turn this page, to look at the deep and necessary matters of our country; but no, they prefer to continue spending millions.
Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence asks to prioritize deep and necessary issues instead of frivolous spending.
Nikolas Ferreira
255:35
About: increase transparency about spending on social media boosting
In the last 30 days, 18.4 million reais were spent by Lula on paid promotion on social media.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence reports R$18.4 million spent on paid promotion, without suggesting direct action.
Nikolas Ferreira
255:44
About: increase municipal basic sanitation coverage
Meanwhile, millions of people have nowhere — excuse me — to relieve themselves.
Why it was classified this way · 82% confidence contrasts government spending with the lack of basic infrastructure, advocating a solution.
Nikolas Ferreira
255:51
About: prioritize investment in basic services over spending on international events
Meanwhile, there is a COP 30 spending millions, even billions of reais.
Why it was classified this way · 68% confidence criticizes spending on COP30 and contrasts it with the lack of basic services.
Nikolas Ferreira
255:54
About: reduce regional inequalities and improve human development indices
Meanwhile, the people who live there have the worst human development indices in Brazil.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence reports that certain populations have worse indicators without proposing immediate action.
Nikolas Ferreira
256:05
About: investigate government payments to influencers
And whoever is not tired, Deputy Mauricio, is profiting from this, because there is no such thing as a free PT supporter.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence claims influencers are paid to speak well of the government, implicitly asking for investigation.
Nikolas Ferreira
256:13
About: investigate government payments to influencers
You can take a look at the influencers who have been speaking well of the Government: they're earning a fortune to be able to speak well of the Government, because there is no such thing as a free PT supporter.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence repeats the accusation of payments to influencers, implicitly calling for investigation.
Nikolas Ferreira
256:22
About: defeat the PT government in the next elections
It's unbearable... No one can stand the PT anymore.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence states that 'ninguém aguenta mais o PT', indicating a desire for political change.
Nikolas Ferreira
256:26
About: defeat the PT government in the next elections
I very much hope that next year we will give a "Goodbye, dear" to President Lula. Thank you, Mr. President.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence explicitly hopes to give 'Tchau, querido' to Lula next year (elections).
Nikolas Ferreira
401:03
About: preserve parliamentary immunity provided for in Article 53 of the Constitution
Ladies and gentlemen, today is a day to record, here in our country, the face of the Left and what, in fact, it defends.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence announces intent to record a defense of the left and its stance against removals from office.
Nikolas Ferreira
401:18
About: preserve parliamentary immunity provided for in Article 53 of the Constitution
I am not giving my opinion, I am not here simply defending Gustavo Gayer personally.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence denies defending a specific person and describes the context (report).
Nikolas Ferreira
401:26
About: preserve parliamentary immunity provided for in Article 53 of the Constitution
This is the defense of the Federal Constitution, which Your Excellencies so often invoke, exalt and claim to defend.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence says their intervention is a defense of the Constitution and parliamentary immunity.
Nikolas Ferreira
401:35
About: preserve parliamentary immunity provided for in Article 53 of the Constitution
Article 53 is crystal clear in establishing that Deputies and Senators are inviolable, civilly and criminally, for any — I repeat, any — of their opinions, words and votes.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence quotes Article 53 literally (normative description of the Constitution).
Nikolas Ferreira
401:53
About: preserve parliamentary immunity provided for in Article 53 of the Constitution
I heard a Deputy who spoke before me say that insults and crude words are not covered by parliamentary immunity.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence refutes a colleague's argument that excludes insults from immunity, defending broader coverage.
Nikolas Ferreira
402:05
About: ensure equal legal treatment among parliamentarians across the political spectrum
Gentlemen, you must be joking. During the 4 years of Bolsonaro's Government, the governing side at the time, Right-wing Deputies were called 'genocidal.'
Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence alleges that right-wing deputies were attacked without the same legal treatment.
Nikolas Ferreira
402:18
About: preserve the precise use of criminal terms (e.g., genocidal) in public debates
Do you know what a 'genocida' is, gentlemen? It is a person who kills on a large scale a particular group.
Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence defines genocidal as a legal term and contextualizes prior accusations.
Nikolas Ferreira
402:27
About: ensure equal legal treatment among parliamentarians across the political spectrum
Bolsonaro has already been called a racist in this House.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence reports that Bolsonaro was called racist; contextualizes prior insults.
Nikolas Ferreira
402:34
About: preserve semantic accuracy in the use of terms like 'racist'
A racist is someone who commits crimes, scorns, is prejudiced against a person because of the color of their skin.
Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence defines racist in legal terms as a counterpoint to accusations.
Nikolas Ferreira
402:43
About: ensure parliamentary freedom of expression within immunity
Just as happened with Jair Bolsonaro, people have already been called rapists by left-wing Parliamentarians inside this House.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence states that serious accusations were also made by left-wing parliamentarians.
Nikolas Ferreira
402:51
About: avoid criminal liability for political statements covered by immunity
I have already been cowardly associated by the President of the Republic with organized crime and by Left-wing Deputies as well.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence reports having been associated with organized crime as an example of persecution.
Nikolas Ferreira
403:01
About: avoid criminal liability for political statements covered by immunity
We, Right-wing Deputies, have already been accused of being Nazis.
Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence says that right-wing deputies were accused of Nazism, defending immunity.
Nikolas Ferreira
403:02
About: preserve historical accuracy when debating extreme ideologies
I want to remind you what Nazism is, which occurred in a time, far from ours, when a genocide against Jews took place, when people were killed in gas chambers, when people were decimated.
Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence Invokes a historical description of Nazism to contextualize the accusations.
Nikolas Ferreira
403:21
About: avoid removing parliamentarians for political labels
We are associated with a current that massacred people.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Says they were associated with groups that 'massacravam pessoas', asking for caution.
Nikolas Ferreira
403:28
About: limit STF action in parliamentary removal matters absent a legislative process
Now, which of us has taken them to the STF to say that you should be expelled from office for your words?
Why it was classified this way · 55% confidence Rhetorically asks about taking cases to the STF, without calling for concrete action.
Nikolas Ferreira
403:41
About: avoid removal from office for opinions or words without just cause
This Congress made a decision that did not change your lives, because you remained free, but it changed the life of Daniel Silveira, who was the first to have his mandate revoked by this House and who is imprisoned to this day.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Cites the decision on Daniel Silveira to argue against removals for words.
Nikolas Ferreira
403:56
About: avoid removal from office for opinions or words without just cause
He could not see his daughter grow up, he stayed in Bangu, a place where criminals like Fernandinho Beiramar were imprisoned.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence Reports personal consequences of a removed parliamentarian (descriptive).
Nikolas Ferreira
404:06
About: avoid removal from office for opinions or words without just cause
This House laughed mockingly at this family man.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Says the House mocked a family man who was arrested, criticizing the sanction.
Nikolas Ferreira
404:13
About: preserve parliamentary immunity provided for in Article 53 of the Constitution
I disagree with what Daniel Silveira said, but I do not have, under the Federal Constitution, the power to strip him of his mandate and much less to imprison him.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Declares disagreement with the content but says they lack constitutional power to remove.
Nikolas Ferreira
404:25
About: ensure the right of parliamentarians to seek judicial redress for offenses
Deputy Gustavo Gayer said that Vanderlan was a scoundrel.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence Recognizes Vanderlan's right to go to the courts after being offended.
Nikolas Ferreira
404:33
About: use legal instruments to contest removal processes
Vanderlan has every right to go to court and do whatever he wants.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Says they have the right to overturn the action because they perceive a lack of symmetry.
Nikolas Ferreira
404:38
About: ensure equal legal treatment for people under investigation regardless of who they are
And we have every right to overturn this action, since we know there is no symmetry between rulings against the Right and rulings against the Left.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Alleges lack of symmetry and argues in defense against unequal decisions.
Nikolas Ferreira
404:51
About: prevent selective judicial persecution of right-wing parliamentarians
Or are you going to say that today those who have the target on their forehead are the Left-wing Deputies?
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Rhetorically asks whether today's targets would be left-wing deputies, denying that possibility.
Nikolas Ferreira
404:57
About: ensure immunity for parliamentarians' verbal expressions
Of course not. After all, they have the approval to say whatever they want.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Says that a left-wing parliamentarian has license to say whatever they want, criticizing double standards.
Nikolas Ferreira
405:06
About: expose and criticize Left speeches that attack the Congress
It must be wonderful to be left-wing in this country, because you can say, for example, that Congress has 300 crooks, as Lula did — the older ones will remember that.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence Cites statements calling Congress '300 picaretas' to criticize the left.
Nikolas Ferreira
405:25
About: avoid relativizing criticism of the National Congress as partisan
That is, he is saying that this is the lowest Congress in all history, but, in fact, he himself said that the Congress he participated in was the lowest in history.
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence Notes a contradiction between the President's past criticisms and the current ones.
Nikolas Ferreira
405:36
About: judge removals strictly according to due process, not for revenge
We cannot here, because each one is functioning almost like a judge, ignore and set aside political issues and merely say, out of vengeance: "It's because I don't like Deputy Gustavo Gayer; it's because I found his words crude."
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence States that personal revenge is not enough for removal, defending a fair process.
Nikolas Ferreira
405:53
About: judge removals strictly according to due process, not for revenge
Whatever the reasons may be will not be plausible nor sufficient justifications for stripping him of his mandate on this day.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence Argues that personal motives do not justify removal (argumentative, legal).
Nikolas Ferreira
406:05
About: preserve due process when considering removals
Today, it is very clear what is happening.
Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence States that what is happening is clear and should be examined legally.
Nikolas Ferreira
406:09
About: limit the powers of the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal)
If they lose votes here, they activate the STF's little annex.
Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence Alleges they call in the 'puxadinho do STF' when they lose votes.
Nikolas Ferreira
406:12
About: limit the powers of the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal)
If they want to persecute any right-wing Deputy, they call on the STF.
Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence Repeats the accusation that the STF is being invoked to persecute right-wing deputies.
Nikolas Ferreira
406:19
About: respect PGR statements for and against in parliamentary proceedings
The PGR itself has already expressed both opposition and support regarding Deputy Gustavo Gayer.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence Says the PGR has already expressed itself against the accusations and in favor of the deputy.
Nikolas Ferreira
406:31
About: restore the debate to categories of truth and falsehood in politics
I'll be very frank with all of you.
Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence States that they are abandoning distinctions between truth and falsehood (opinion).
Nikolas Ferreira
406:34
About: prevent the Left from silencing right-wing parliamentarians and removing them from the electoral race
We are putting aside the word "truth" and the word "lie," the word "good" and the word "bad," the word "just" and the word "unjust."
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Alleges the goal is to silence a right-wing deputy and prevent his future election.
Nikolas Ferreira
406:48
About: prevent the Left from silencing right-wing parliamentarians and removing them from the electoral race
What is happening here is a rabid and hateful defense of a figure, because, obviously, if that figure continues his work, I have no doubt he will be the future Senator of Goiás.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Says that if this figure remains he will be a future senator, hence the motivation for persecution.
Nikolas Ferreira
407:12
About: punish deputies who commit crimes
If Parliamentarians have any doubt about how to vote or how to proceed, bear in mind that not a single, absolutely no, Deputy here in this House who engaged in a rachadinha scheme has been stripped of their mandate.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Says no deputy involved in rachadinha was removed, calling for equal treatment.
Nikolas Ferreira
407:32
About: investigate irregularities involving parliamentarians and NGOs
People inside this House were involved in meal-provision schemes with NGOs, and they were not removed from office.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence Cites schemes involving NGOs and meal programs, suggesting there were no removals in those cases.
Nikolas Ferreira
407:41
About: not remove deputies for their words, opinions, or votes
There are people who say whatever they want here in this House, but the Right will never support stripping a Deputy of their mandate because of their words, opinions, or votes.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Declares that the Right will not support removal over words, reaffirming immunity.
Nikolas Ferreira
407:51
About: guarantee freedom of expression
In our democracy, they can say whatever they want, even things we disagree with; but in their democracy, we cannot say what we agree with and what they disagree with.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Argues that in a democracy everyone may speak, even when disagreeing.
Nikolas Ferreira
408:07
About: treat the vote on parliamentary immunity as a serious, not routine matter
Therefore, this is not merely a vote like the one on some national day.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Says the vote is extremely serious, not merely symbolic.
Nikolas Ferreira
408:17
About: preserve parliamentary immunity provided for in Article 53 of the Constitution
We are voting on something extremely serious, which is parliamentary immunity, which is being made subject to personal whim.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence States that immunity is being relativized and is a central issue in the vote.
Nikolas Ferreira
408:28
About: ensure that insults and speech by parliamentarians remain covered by immunity
When it is a left-wing Deputy accusing another of being corrupt, connected to organized crime, fascist, Nazi, a rapist, homophobic, transphobic, or a pedophile, then it's allowed.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Criticizes the argument that excludes insults from immunity, defending its broad scope.
Nikolas Ferreira
408:45
About: maintain pluralism of voices in parliament without selective punishments
So, are you going to say I'm lying? I'm not lying.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Denies lying and reaffirms the right to speak in the country (defense of pluralism).
Nikolas Ferreira
408:48
About: ensure parliamentary immunity even in cases of verbal excess
You say whatever you want in this country.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Argues that excesses of the Right are also covered by immunity.
Nikolas Ferreira
408:52
About: preserve parliamentary immunity provided for in Article 53 of the Constitution
Similarly, when it's the Right, even if there is an excess, it is covered by parliamentary immunity.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Reads the constitutional text and reiterates the inviolability of deputies and senators.
Nikolas Ferreira
409:00
About: preserve parliamentary immunity provided for in Article 53 of the Constitution
I will read Article 53 of the Federal Constitution once again.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Quietly cites article 53, quoting the constitutional provision (legal description).
Nikolas Ferreira
409:07
About: require that justifications for removal go beyond narratives and be based in law
I'm going to speak very quietly so everyone can hear me: Art. 53.
Why it was classified this way · 82% confidence Says that what goes beyond art.53 are narratives and fallacious arguments.
Nikolas Ferreira
409:12
About: avoid using removal from office for political or electoral purposes
Deputies and Senators are inviolable, civilly and criminally, for any of their opinions, words, and votes.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Says that disqualification would be the Left's way to silence opponents and remove them from the electoral race.
Nikolas Ferreira
409:25
About: avoid using removal from office for political or electoral purposes
What goes beyond this are just narratives. It's nothing but fallacious argumentation to strip a Deputy — who, obviously, has been doing his oversight work and has expressed his opinion in a combative manner — of his mandate.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence Repeats that the action is a way to silence and politically exclude opponents.
Nikolas Ferreira
409:44
About: stay the criminal prosecution and vote to maintain parliamentary immunity
I have no doubt that this is just a way for the Left to silence a right-wing Deputy and take him out of next year's electoral race.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Closes with an explicit vote: 'Sim' for the suspension of the criminal action.
Nikolas Ferreira
417:18
About: stay the criminal prosecution and vote to maintain parliamentary immunity
This is very clear. "Yes" to the suspension of the criminal prosecution!
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence Calls for 'Sim' to the suspension, defending immunity and an end to the criminal action.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology