Analyzed statements
Sessão Deliberativa Extraordinária Presencial (AM nº 123/2020)
45 classified statements · 1 politicians · May 20, 2026
Statements by Kim Kataguiri. 45 excerpts classified by topic and stance. Topics: Education, Public Budget, Regional Development, Agriculture & Agribusiness.
Speakers
Kim Kataguiri45
Classified statements
Excerpts classified by topic and stance. This is not the full transcript of the video.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
209:05
About: increase funding for municipal education
Mr. President, the Missão Party instructs "no". Teachers do not receive the salary floor and will not receive it because of this provisional measure.
Why it was classified this way · 92% confidence instructs a 'não' vote against the provisional measure addressing the floor.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
209:14
About: increase funding for municipal education
Today it's very easy for Parliament, the Federal Government, the National Congress to say they will raise the teachers' salary floor without guaranteeing resources to the States and Municipalities to, in fact, implement that floor.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence criticizes promises of increases without guaranteeing resources to states and municipalities.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
209:29
About: increase funding for municipal education
They say the funds will be taken from Fundeb, but the provisional measure does not transfer a single more cent from Fundeb to the States and Municipalities so they can comply with that floor.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence says the MP does not transfer Fundeb resources to meet the floor.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
209:39
About: increase funding for municipal education
The courts of accounts point out that more than 80% of the States do not pay the current salary floor.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence reports TCE data about states that do not pay the current floor.
ForKim Kataguiri
209:45
About: cut mandatory parliamentary amendments and the secret budget
The National Congress does not make any sacrifice of its own, because there is no shortage of money.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence accuses Congress of not making sacrifices and suggests cuts to privileges.
ForKim Kataguiri
209:49
About: cut mandatory parliamentary amendments and the secret budget
What is missing is for the Congress itself to make cuts, including curtailing the privileges of the Parliamentarians themselves, so that, in fact, there are resources for the Municipalities and the States.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence explicitly calls to 'cortar na carne' privileges to free up resources.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
209:58
About: increase funding for municipal education
So, out of the duty of my own conscience not to want to mislead the teachers, the voting instruction is "no".
Why it was classified this way · 95% confidence declares a 'não' voting orientation out of conscience.
ForKim Kataguiri
279:14
About: implement regional development policies in Pará
Mr. President, the Missão Party votes in favor of Deputy José Priante's report, and 100% in favor of his report for the development of Pará — of Santa Isabel, my mother's; of Ananindeua, my uncles' — of pato no tucupi, of maniçoba, of the Ver-o-Peso tonic. So we vote in favor.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence declares a favorable vote for the report for the development of Pará.
ForKim Kataguiri
345:25
About: guarantee legal security for rural producers
Mr. President, the Missão Party instructs "yes". I want to congratulate the work of Deputy Marussa and say that it is essential to have, at minimum, the right to a defense — before taking a measure as onerous as those, unfortunately, being taken today — to guarantee a minimum of legal certainty and justice in relation to the rural producer. So, congratulations, Deputy Marussa!
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence defends the producer's right to defense before onerous measures.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
395:27
About: regulate fuel prices
Mr. President, I think they learned nothing from the Sarney Government.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence says they did not learn from Sarney, criticizing the repetition of controls.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
395:33
About: criminalize abusive price increases
When there is a price increase, the solution is to criminalize the price increase, which causes shortages, which causes smuggling, which strengthens organized crime.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence says that criminalizing price increases causes shortages and crime.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
395:43
About: implement fuel price controls
I'm eager to see the little people with the little star going to inspect the stations, the distributors or Petrobras itself, putting up signs "Lula's Inspector", to see if price control will work.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence mocks the oversight labeled 'Fiscal do Lula' as ineffective populism.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
395:56
About: regulate fuel prices
It's obvious that this has no economic effect; it's pure populism, pure demagoguery.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence calls the measure populism with no economic effect.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
396:03
About: criminalize abusive price increases
Look at what the text says: price increase in, quote, "supply crisis or relevant market instability".
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence quotes a passage of the legal text about 'crise de abastecimento' in a descriptive manner.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
396:15
About: criminalize abusive price increases
Who will judge what is instability? Who will judge what is relevant in that market instability?
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence questions who will judge 'instabilidade relevante', criticizing the subjectivity.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
396:20
About: criminalize abusive price increases
This is absolutely subjective; it will not generate a reduction in the price of anything.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence states that subjectivity will not reduce prices.
ForKim Kataguiri
396:25
About: remove the price-control proposal from the agenda
Therefore, our instruction is "yes" to removing it from the agenda.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence declares a 'sim' position in favor of removing the proposal from the agenda.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
424:15
About: ensure fuel supply
Mr. President, there will be a diesel shortage in Brazil because of the Lula Government — let that be recorded!
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence attributes the risk of diesel shortages to the government, reporting a possible supply shortfall.
ForKim Kataguiri
424:24
About: invest in science and technology in the oil, gas and refining sector
Petrobras stopped importing diesel. The PT governments had 20 years for us to become self-sufficient in all petroleum derivatives.
Why it was classified this way · 84% confidence criticizes governments for not investing over 20 years to achieve self-sufficiency.
ForKim Kataguiri
424:41
About: investigate and punish corruption in major public works
At Abreu e Lima and in Pasadena, there were major corruption scandals in which PT governments plundered our country, using refineries that should have been used so we could be self-sufficient, so we wouldn't need to import diesel, so we wouldn't have to import any petroleum derivative.
Why it was classified this way · 86% confidence cites the Abreu e Lima and Pasadena scandals as examples of plundering.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
425:02
About: ensure fuel supply
Today we have our own oil production, we are self-sufficient in crude oil, we export oil, but we still need to import derivatives because we don't have refineries capable of meeting the national market.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence reports that the country produces oil but imports derivatives due to a lack of refineries.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
425:15
About: properly hold fuel sector actors accountable
I heard all kinds of nonsense here — and mind you, I'm no specialist in the oil and gas sector — but, just by knowing a little more than the basics, I wouldn't say such big nonsense as: "Look, the problem is the distributor's sale".
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence rejects the idea that distributors are responsible for diesel shortages.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
425:27
About: properly hold fuel sector actors accountable
Folks, a distributor is not responsible for refining, for our not having diesel here, for us not being self-sufficient in petroleum derivatives.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence states that distributors are not responsible for refining or for diesel shortages.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
425:36
About: properly hold fuel sector actors accountable
The distributor has absolutely nothing to do with this point.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence reaffirms that distributors 'não têm absolutamente nada a ver' with refining.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
425:39
About: punish gas stations for abusive price increases
"Oh no, it's because there is an abusive increase by the gas station".
Why it was classified this way · 82% confidence downplays the role of gas stations and criticizes the focus on policing gas station prices.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
425:43
About: punish gas stations for abusive price increases
Folks, gas stations face high competition; they compete for profit margins in pennies.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence says gas stations face high competition and fight over margins of a few cents.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
425:48
About: regulate fuel prices
Even if there are major abuses by gas stations, Brazil's problem is much deeper than such a shallow and populist debate.
Why it was classified this way · 86% confidence states the problem is deeper than the shallow, populist debate about prices.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
425:55
About: invest in science and technology in the oil, gas and refining sector
During the last 40 years — and I'm not only talking about PT governments — we did not have the capacity to invest in science and technology in the oil and gas sector and in refining, to become self-sufficient.
Why it was classified this way · 72% confidence reports 40 years without the capacity to invest in refining and science.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
426:13
About: implement state reform and modernize infrastructure
We lost historic opportunities, as we lost several over the last 40 years, in productivity, modernization, State reform, and infrastructure improvement.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence reports historical missed opportunities for productivity and modernization.
ForKim Kataguiri
426:30
About: expand refining capacity and invest in technology in the oil and gas sector
In the oil and gas sector, once again, even being blessed with natural resources, we have such a capacity for self-sabotage that, even so, at this time of international oil crisis, it shouldn't have been bad for Brazil.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence criticizes self-sabotage that prevented taking advantage of an opportunity during the oil crisis.
ForKim Kataguiri
426:47
About: expand refining capacity and invest in technology in the oil and gas sector
Brazil should have had a tremendous competitive advantage, with which it would profit by selling to other countries that would be needing these products.
Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence says Brazil could profit by selling refined products if it had adequate refining capacity.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
427:00
About: ensure fuel supply
We have put ourselves in this situation of depending on products from abroad.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence states the country has become dependent on foreign products.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
427:04
About: ensure fuel supply
And now Petrobras, just so it doesn't have to raise prices in an election year, stopped importing.
Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence says Petrobras stopped importing to avoid price increases.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
427:11
About: ensure fuel supply
And it's not as if this will make the product cheaper and that the product will still be there.
Why it was classified this way · 72% confidence notes that stopping imports will not make the product cheaper, reporting that consequence.
ForKim Kataguiri
427:14
About: ensure fuel supply
There simply will be no product. There will be shortages, because the Government does not want to assume the burden of taking an unpopular but necessary measure. Hence my opposing position, Mr. President.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence states opposition because it foresees shortages caused by government decisions.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
448:19
About: regulate fuel prices
Mr. President, price control doesn't work; it only generates shortages, only generates smuggling, only strengthens crime.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence claims price controls only cause shortages, smuggling, and crime.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
448:32
About: regulate fuel prices
Once again the same practice is repeated, with the same rhetoric, wanting to shift the blame for fuel prices onto the entrepreneur, when in reality it stems from the Government's own incompetence in structuring its public policy, even to grant incentives.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence accuses the government of blaming entrepreneurs instead of structuring public policy.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
448:48
About: offer tax incentives to reduce fuel prices
A large part of companies didn't even accept the Government's program, because the Government made so many demands that it becomes more costly to accept the tax benefit than to actually reduce the fuel price.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence says companies didn't accept the program because the requirements made the benefit costly.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
449:00
About: regulate fuel prices
Mr. President, it's a bizarre thing! Not even the Government, offering money, can control fuel prices because of the very precarious design of public policy it made, and now it tries to push this criminalization so that, as in the Sarney Government, it shifts the burden of the Government's incompetence onto the private sector.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence states the government cannot control prices even when offering money; calls it bizarre.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
463:31
About: criminalize abusive price increases
Mr. President, if the project's intention is, indeed, as the Government states, to curb abusive price increases, this amendment specifies what those abuses are.
Why it was classified this way · 72% confidence says the amendment specifies which abuses it seeks to curb (quotes the amendment text).
AgainstKim Kataguiri
463:43
About: criminalize abusive price increases
The reality is that the intention is to leave this subjective margin, to leave the discourse that: "Well, if the price is going up, it's the private sector's fault, it's the entrepreneurs' fault.
Why it was classified this way · 87% confidence states the intent is to leave subjective leeway to blame the private sector.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
463:54
About: criminalize abusive price increases
So, let's arrest the entrepreneurs". I repeat: it's the same rhetoric from the Sarney era.
Why it was classified this way · 86% confidence Repeats that the discourse aims to imprison entrepreneurs, comparing it to Sarney.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
464:01
About: criminalize abusive price increases
If the Government can't control inflation, let's criminalize raising prices, because the focus ceases to be holding the Government responsible for not being able to control public accounts, and becomes the business owner the villain for raising prices because the cost of living is rising.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence Says that criminalizing price increases distracts from the government's responsibility.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
464:17
About: regulate fuel prices
Similarly, the Government designs a poor measure to curb fuel increases, which most market actors did not want to adhere to, not even for the money the Government is offering.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence Criticizes the government's design to contain increases, which market actors did not adhere to.
ForKim Kataguiri
464:29
About: remove the price-control proposal from the agenda
The Government fails and now wants to criminalize the other side. The vote is "yes".
Why it was classified this way · 92% confidence Declares a vote 'sim' to remove it from the agenda because the government tried to criminalize the other side.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology