Analyzed statements
Sessão Deliberativa Extraordinária Semipresencial (AM nº 123/2020)
48 classified statements · 1 politicians · July 15, 2026
Statements by Kim Kataguiri. 48 excerpts classified by topic and stance. Topics: Violence Against Women and Protection, Public Safety and Order, Official Documents, Criminal Justice.
Speakers
Kim Kataguiri48
Classified statements
Excerpts classified by topic and stance. This is not the full transcript of the video.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
40:53
About: criminalize acts of misogyny
So, to place that within the scope of the PL of misogyny, where the discourse is to combat violence against women, where the argument is that it starts with a little joke and ends with the death of a woman, to cite a joke about someone being 'mogado,' someone being a betinha, someone being sigma...
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence criticizes including slang in the PL as inappropriate to the goal of combating violence.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
41:16
About: criminalize acts of misogyny
This diminishes and shows the Deputy's true intention behind that PL.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence claims this 'diminui' the PL and reveals the deputy's hidden intent.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
41:21
About: criminalize acts of misogyny
I even make an appeal, taking advantage of this rare moment, in which, in the pre‑electoral period, the plenary has a significant number of Deputies, to say that this is the true intention.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence makes a public appeal claiming that this is the real intent behind the PL.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
41:32
About: criminalize acts of misogyny
In a debate, Deputy Tabata Amaral said: 'No, I don't want to criminalize the joke, I don't want to criminalize people who are jerks.'
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence quotes the deputy's statement denying any intent to criminalize jokes.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
41:38
About: criminalize acts of misogyny
She said she never filed a lawsuit against a comedian, but she did file, represented before the Public Prosecutor's Office, requested the imprisonment of a comedian for making a joke, and that comedian was fired from his job.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence relates a past action by the deputy with the MP against a comedian.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
41:49
About: criminalize acts of misogyny
So, we see that the intention is one thing, the hidden agenda behind it is another, and the discourse is yet another.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence accuses a gap between rhetoric and actions, criticizing the agenda behind the PL.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
41:56
About: criminalize acts of misogyny
To say that there is an industry behind the 'betinha' speech...
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence rejects the 'indústria da misoginia' narrative when applied to Generation Z slang.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
42:00
About: criminalize acts of misogyny
Really, there was nothing left to do except defend a text as absurd as the one that was put forward.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence calls the text 'esdrúxulo' and criticizes the defense of the bill.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
42:09
About: publicly speak out in defense of victims of sexual violence
When there was the episode of several minors who carried out a gang rape against girls and boys under 14 years of age, the Deputy did not speak up in defense of those women who suffered the gang rape.
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence reports that the deputy did not comment on the collective rape.
ForKim Kataguiri
42:25
About: reduce the age of criminal responsibility to 16 years
When there was the vote on the PEC to reduce the age of criminal responsibility, she voted against the reduction, that is, she voted in favor of minors who rape and commit pedophilia being detained for a maximum of 3 years.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence criticizes the vote against the reduction and opposes the deputy's position.
ForKim Kataguiri
42:38
About: reduce the age of criminal responsibility to 16 years
So I ask the women of Brazil: do you think it is fair that a kid, a thug, a criminal of 16 or 17 years of age, as we saw happen in São Paulo, who takes part in a gang rape of a woman, would be detained for a maximum of 3 years, or that the toughening of sentence enforcement for heinous crimes, such as rape and femicide, only occurs after recurrence, as was defended by the PT and PSOL here in the plenary?
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence poses a rhetorical question advocating harsher punishments for juvenile offenders.
ForKim Kataguiri
43:05
About: reduce the age of criminal responsibility to 16 years
Only after someone kills the second woman, only after someone rapes the second woman, should penal enforcement be toughened?
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence criticizes toughening only after recidivism, calling for immediate punishment.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
76:21
About: allow use of religious adornments (turban and headdress) in official document photos
Mr. President, the Missão Party advises 'no.' We are voting here on permission to, in official documents, take photos wearing a turban, a cocar (feather headdress), and so on.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence states the party's guidance to vote 'não' on allowing photos with accessories.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
76:28
About: allow use of religious adornments (turban and headdress) in official document photos
And the purpose of taking a photo for a document is precisely to be able to recognize the person 100%, to clearly see their face.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence argues that a document photo serves to recognize the full face.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
76:37
About: allow use of religious adornments (turban and headdress) in official document photos
Indeed, for that reason, Deputy Lafayette pointed out that you need to remove your glasses.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence cites the requirement to remove glasses as an argument for facial identification.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
76:41
About: allow use of religious adornments (turban and headdress) in official document photos
So it's natural that you need to be able to clearly recognize a person's face.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence says it is natural to require clear facial recognition in documents.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
76:45
About: allow use of religious adornments (turban and headdress) in official document photos
Although the bill states that recognition should be preserved, etc., we know that wearing a turban, a tiara, or any accessory makes it harder to identify someone on the document.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence alleges that accessories hinder identification despite mentions of preservation.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
76:55
About: allow use of religious adornments (turban and headdress) in official document photos
I think this should not even be important enough to come to the Plenary, but since it did, I will advise against it.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence states they will issue guidance opposing the bill in the plenary.
ForKim Kataguiri
110:29
About: interrupt the statute of limitations if a convicted person escapes
Mr. President, we approved an important bill authored by me.
Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence calls for approval of a bill they authored on the statute of limitations during escape.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
110:36
About: interrupt the statute of limitations if a convicted person escapes
It's almost obvious: today, if a sentenced prisoner, with a final judgment, escapes from prison, or if there is already a conviction and he should be arrested and he evades the arrest warrant, the crime can prescribe.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence describes the current situation where the statute of limitations applies after a prolonged escape.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
110:51
About: interrupt the statute of limitations if a convicted person escapes
So, depending on the crime, he flees for 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, then he can return and present himself to Justice or to a police chief as if nothing had happened, and say: 'Look, I really committed the crime, I was arrested, then I escaped.'
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence describes a scenario in which a fugitive returns and benefits from the statute of limitations.
ForKim Kataguiri
111:13
About: interrupt the statute of limitations if a convicted person escapes
What we are doing now is very simple.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence announces the legislative change that is being made now.
ForKim Kataguiri
111:16
About: interrupt the statute of limitations if a convicted person escapes
You were convicted, you fled, you lose the right to prescription (the statute of limitations).
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence explicitly states the bill's content: loss of the right to invoke the statute of limitations.
ForKim Kataguiri
111:20
About: interrupt the statute of limitations if a convicted person escapes
The crime will not prescribe while you are on the run, which is obvious; otherwise you are rewarding and encouraging the person to flee, because if he is successful in his escape and not caught within a certain period of time, which will depend on the crime he committed, he can return as if nothing had happened.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence states clearly that the crime's statute of limitations will not run during the period of flight.
ForKim Kataguiri
111:47
About: interrupt the statute of limitations if a convicted person escapes
I wish and hope that in the Senate — the Senators sometimes sit around in slippers and do not advance projects approved in this House — now this bill will be quickly approved.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence asks for quick approval in the Senate of the bill already approved in the Chamber of Deputies.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
125:36
About: approve the bill regulating the games sector
Mr. President, the Missão Party advises a vote against.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence declares the Missão party's guidance to vote against the matter.
ForKim Kataguiri
125:40
About: give more time for analysis and debate of games sector regulation before voting
This is an extensive regulation, 44 pages, which I think would deserve a more thorough analysis.
Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence advocates deeper analysis due to the bill's length (44 pages).
ForKim Kataguiri
125:45
About: give more time for analysis and debate of games sector regulation before voting
Instead of approving urgency and bringing the matter directly to the Plenary, we should give more time, even so that the party leaders can prepare their technical notes and have a more in-depth debate.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence proposes not approving urgency and giving more time for technical notes and debate.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
125:59
About: approve the bill regulating the games sector
This bill gets into the minutiae of sector regulation; it goes far beyond the current legislation.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence states that the bill details minutiae of regulation beyond current law.
ForKim Kataguiri
126:06
About: give more time for analysis and debate of games sector regulation before voting
So I think that, given the length of the bill, it would be important for us to debate it better and discuss it more in the College of Leaders before taking the urgency to the Plenary.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence suggests debate in the College of Leaders before bringing urgency to the Plenary.
ForKim Kataguiri
135:57
About: approve the bill regulating the games sector
Mr. President, I am absolutely in favor of this bill.
Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence explicitly declares being 'absolutamente favorável' to the bill.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
136:00
About: ensure minimum server maintenance and transparency for digital games
We had this controversy recently in the world of games, of companies ending physical media.
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence reports controversy over the end of physical media in the gaming world.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
136:07
About: ensure minimum server maintenance and transparency for digital games
For some time, we have been discussing the arbitrary shutdown of servers.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence reports a debate about arbitrary server shutdowns.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
136:12
About: ensure minimum server maintenance and transparency for digital games
Companies do not make it clear to the consumer that they are not selling the game itself, but rather temporarily granting a license for that game to be used by the purchaser.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence describes the practice of companies selling temporary licenses without clarity to consumers.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
136:25
About: ensure minimum server maintenance and transparency for digital games
So the bill establishes a minimum period of 2 years for server maintenance, patches, regular bug and error fixes, and requires a 180-day prior notice before that server is shut down and the user loses access to that game.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence sets out a provision of the bill: a minimum term of 2 years and 180 days' prior notice.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
136:43
About: ensure minimum server maintenance and transparency for digital games
From that shutdown, the platform will have some options: it can provide the game 100% offline, that is, allow the player to keep playing without the server; make available the server infrastructure so that the community itself can maintain its servers independently of that company.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence lists the alternatives provided (offline mode, making the server available to the community).
ForKim Kataguiri
136:59
About: ensure minimum server maintenance and transparency for digital games
In this way, the bill ends an abusive industry where the user thinks they are buying the game, but are buying a temporary license.
Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence argues that the bill combats an abusive practice in which the consumer is deceived.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
137:09
About: create a public fund to finance video games
Now, Mr. President, I need to clarify a point that is in the bill, which I think should not be in this discussion, but we will discuss it with the future Rapporteur: it concerns the creation of a public fund and also the transfer to Iphan of the administration of declaring cultural heritage for the regulation of games that will be made available in the National Library.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence criticizes including the creation of a public fund in the regulation of games.
AgainstKim Kataguiri
137:32
About: create a public fund to finance video games
I think these are completely distinct matters and that they hinder the discussion.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence considers the creation of a fund a separate issue that hinders the discussion.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
137:35
About: create a public fund to finance video games
The players are not asking for the creation of a public fund; the players are not asking that Iphan regulate games that are of national or cultural interest.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence states that players are not asking for the creation of a public fund.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
137:47
About: create a public fund to finance video games
The players are not asking that funds be raised for a fund to then finance game initiatives that will be chosen by the Ministry of Culture.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence reaffirms that players are not asking for fundraising for a financing fund.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
137:54
About: correct information asymmetry in the games market through regulation
The demand is simply to correct a market failure: information asymmetry.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence defines players' demand as a correction of a market failure (asymmetry).
NeutralKim Kataguiri
138:01
About: correct information asymmetry in the games market through regulation
The company knows when it will shut down the server, the company even knows how long it will maintain its activities, but it does not clarify this to the consumer.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence describes that companies know when to shut down servers and do not inform consumers.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
138:08
About: correct information asymmetry in the games market through regulation
The company knows that it is not selling the game; the company knows it is selling a license, but it does not make that clear to the consumer.
Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence states that companies sell temporary licenses without making that clear to consumers.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
138:15
About: correct information asymmetry in the games market through regulation
I remember very clearly a Consumer Law class — something I will never forget.
Why it was classified this way · 60% confidence uses a Consumer Law class example to explain the problem.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
138:20
About: correct information asymmetry in the games market through regulation
The market failure of information asymmetry is not about the less advantaged.
Why it was classified this way · 65% confidence explains that information asymmetry does not depend on consumer vulnerability.
NeutralKim Kataguiri
138:26
About: correct information asymmetry in the games market through regulation
A billionaire who buys a hot dog on the corner will have less information power regarding that hot dog than the vendor, who is a million times poorer than him, but the vendor knows what the ingredients were, knows if there is expired product or not, if there is spoiled product or not.
Why it was classified this way · 70% confidence illustrates information asymmetry with a seller knowing the ingredients while the buyer does not.
ForKim Kataguiri
138:45
About: ensure minimum server maintenance and transparency for digital games
Then an intervention occurs to correct a market failure, which is information asymmetry, because for a citizen to make a free choice and the best choice for himself, he needs to know exactly what he is buying and what he is dealing with. Thank you, Mr. President.
Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence advocates regulatory intervention to correct information asymmetry and protect consumer choice.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology